If EPS Growth Is Important To You, Agilent Technologies (NYSE:A) Presents An Opportunity
If EPS Growth Is Important To You, Agilent Technologies (NYSE:A) Presents An Opportunity
Investors are often guided by the idea of discovering 'the next big thing', even if that means buying 'story stocks' without any revenue, let alone profit. Unfortunately, these high risk investments often have little probability of ever paying off, and many investors pay a price to learn their lesson. A loss-making company is yet to prove itself with profit, and eventually the inflow of external capital may dry up.
投资者往往被发现“下一个大事件”的想法所指导,即使这意味着购买没有任何营业收入,更别提利润的“故事股”。不幸的是,这些高风险投资往往几乎没有可能得到回报,许多投资者付出了代价来吸取教训。亏损的公司尚未通过盈利证明自己,最终外部资本的流入可能会枯竭。
In contrast to all that, many investors prefer to focus on companies like Agilent Technologies (NYSE:A), which has not only revenues, but also profits. Even if this company is fairly valued by the market, investors would agree that generating consistent profits will continue to provide Agilent Technologies with the means to add long-term value to shareholders.
与此形成鲜明对照的是,许多投资者更喜欢关注像安捷伦科技(NYSE:A)这样不仅具有营业收入,而且还有利润的公司。即使这家公司被市场公平估值,投资者也会认同稳定盈利会继续为安捷伦科技提供增加股东长期价值的手段。
How Fast Is Agilent Technologies Growing?
安捷伦科技的增长速度有多快?
Generally, companies experiencing growth in earnings per share (EPS) should see similar trends in share price. That makes EPS growth an attractive quality for any company. Agilent Technologies managed to grow EPS by 15% per year, over three years. That growth rate is fairly good, assuming the company can keep it up.
通常,每股收益(EPS)增长的公司应该看到股价出现类似的趋势。这使得EPS增长成为任何公司的有吸引力的品质。安捷伦科技成功每年以15%的速度增长EPS,持续三年。假设公司能够保持这样的增长率,这是相当不错的。
One way to double-check a company's growth is to look at how its revenue, and earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) margins are changing. Unfortunately, Agilent Technologies' revenue dropped 7.1% last year, but the silver lining is that EBIT margins improved from 21% to 24%. That falls short of ideal.
检查公司增长的一种方法是查看其营业收入和利息税前利润(EBIT)的利润率如何变化。不幸的是,安捷伦科技的营业收入去年下降了7.1%,但好的一面是EBIt利润率从21%提高到24%。这还不够理想。
In the chart below, you can see how the company has grown earnings and revenue, over time. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers.
在下面的图表中,您可以看到该公司随着时间的推移如何增长收入和收益。单击图表以查看确切的数字。
Of course the knack is to find stocks that have their best days in the future, not in the past. You could base your opinion on past performance, of course, but you may also want to check this interactive graph of professional analyst EPS forecasts for Agilent Technologies.
当然,关键是找到未来表现更好而不是过去表现好的股票。当然,您可以根据过去的表现来形成自己的观点,但您可能还想查看这个互动图表,以了解Agilent Technologies的专业分析师每股收益预测。
Are Agilent Technologies Insiders Aligned With All Shareholders?
Agilent Technologies内部人员与所有股东保持一致吗?
Since Agilent Technologies has a market capitalisation of US$41b, we wouldn't expect insiders to hold a large percentage of shares. But we do take comfort from the fact that they are investors in the company. Notably, they have an enviable stake in the company, worth US$114m. While that is a lot of skin in the game, we note this holding only totals to 0.3% of the business, which is a result of the company being so large. This should still be a great incentive for management to maximise shareholder value.
由于Agilent Technologies的市值为410亿美元,我们不会期望内部人持有大比例的股份。但我们从这一事实中得到了一些安慰,即他们是公司的投资者。值得注意的是,他们在公司拥有令人羡慕的股权,价值1,1400万美元。尽管这是一笔巨额投资,但我们注意到这仅占公司业务的0.3%,这是由于公司规模过大所致。这仍然应该是管理层最大化股东价值的巨大激励措施。
While it's always good to see some strong conviction in the company from insiders through heavy investment, it's also important for shareholders to ask if management compensation policies are reasonable. Well, based on the CEO pay, you'd argue that they are indeed. For companies with market capitalisations over US$8.0b, like Agilent Technologies, the median CEO pay is around US$13m.
虽然看到公司内部人员通过大笔投资来表达对公司的坚定信心总是好事,但股东也重要要问的是管理层的薪酬政策是否合理。嗯,根据首席执行官的薪酬,可以说他们的确合理。对于市值超过80亿美元的公司(如Agilent Technologies)来说,首席执行官的薪酬中位数约为1300万美元。
Agilent Technologies' CEO took home a total compensation package of US$3.3m in the year prior to October 2023. That looks like a modest pay packet, and may hint at a certain respect for the interests of shareholders. CEO remuneration levels are not the most important metric for investors, but when the pay is modest, that does support enhanced alignment between the CEO and the ordinary shareholders. Generally, arguments can be made that reasonable pay levels attest to good decision-making.
Agilent Technologies的首席执行官在2023年10月之前的一年中获得了总计330万美元的薪酬套餐。这看起来像是一份适度的薪酬,可能暗示着对股东利益的某种尊重。首席执行官的薪酬水平并不是投资者最重要的衡量指标,但当薪酬适度时,这确实支持首席执行官与普通股东之间的更好协调。一般来说,可以认为合理的薪酬水平证明了良好的决策能力。
Does Agilent Technologies Deserve A Spot On Your Watchlist?
安捷伦科技应该出现在你的自选列表上吗?
One positive for Agilent Technologies is that it is growing EPS. That's nice to see. Earnings growth might be the main attraction for Agilent Technologies, but the fun does not stop there. With a meaningful level of insider ownership, and reasonable CEO pay, a reasonable mind might conclude that this is one stock worth watching. You still need to take note of risks, for example - Agilent Technologies has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
安捷伦科技的一个积极因素是它的每股收益增长。这是一个令人高兴的现象。营收增长可能是安捷伦科技的主要吸引力,但乐趣并不止于此。拥有相当数量的内部股权和合理的首席执行官薪酬,一个明智的人可能会得出结论,这是值得关注的一个股票。你仍然需要注意风险,比如,安捷伦科技有1个预警信号,我们认为你应该了解。
While opting for stocks without growing earnings and absent insider buying can yield results, for investors valuing these key metrics, here is a carefully selected list of companies in the US with promising growth potential and insider confidence.
尽管不增长收益且没有内部人士购买的股票可能会有回报,但对于重视这些关键指标的投资者来说,以下是在美国具有潜在增长和内部人士信心的经过慎重筛选的公司列表。
Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction.
请注意,本文讨论的内部交易是指在相关司法管辖区中报告的交易。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。