Lam Research's (NASDAQ:LRCX) Earnings Growth Rate Lags the 33% CAGR Delivered to Shareholders
Lam Research's (NASDAQ:LRCX) Earnings Growth Rate Lags the 33% CAGR Delivered to Shareholders
It hasn't been the best quarter for Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ:LRCX) shareholders, since the share price has fallen 14% in that time. But that doesn't change the fact that shareholders have received really good returns over the last five years. It's fair to say most would be happy with 285% the gain in that time. Generally speaking the long term returns will give you a better idea of business quality than short periods can. Of course, that doesn't necessarily mean it's cheap now.
对于Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ:LRCX)的股东来说,这可能不是最好的一个季度,因为股价在这段时间内下跌了14%。但这并不改变股东在过去五年中获得了真正不错的回报的事实。可以说,大多数人对这段时间内的285%的收益感到满意。总的来说,长期回报会比短期回报更能反映公司的质量。当然,并不意味着现在它很便宜。
While the stock has fallen 4.9% this week, it's worth focusing on the longer term and seeing if the stocks historical returns have been driven by the underlying fundamentals.
虽然这只股票本周下跌了4.9%,但应该关注更长期的表现,看看股票的历史回报是否受到了基本面的支撑。
There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.
市场有时毫无疑问是有效的,但股票价格并不总是反映基本业务表现。一种有缺陷但合理的方法是比较每股收益(EPS)和股票价格,以评估围绕公司的情绪如何变化。
Over half a decade, Lam Research managed to grow its earnings per share at 15% a year. This EPS growth is slower than the share price growth of 31% per year, over the same period. So it's fair to assume the market has a higher opinion of the business than it did five years ago. And that's hardly shocking given the track record of growth.
在过去的五年中,Lam Research每股收益以每年15%的速度增长。与此同时,股价在同一时期内以每年31%的速度增长。所以可以合理地认为市场对该公司的看法比五年前更高。考虑到增长的历史记录,这并不令人震惊。
You can see how EPS has changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).
您可以在下面的图片中查看每股收益如何随时间变化(单击图表以查看确切的价值)。
It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on Lam Research's earnings, revenue and cash flow.
查看我们关于Lam Research的收益、营业收入和现金流的免费报告可能是非常值得的。
What About Dividends?
那么分红怎么样呢?
It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. As it happens, Lam Research's TSR for the last 5 years was 311%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!
考虑到股票的总股东回报率以及股价回报率对于任何给定的股票都是很重要的。TSR结合了任何剥离或折价融资的价值,以及基于股利再投资的假设来计算股利。可以说,TSR给出了一张更全面的股票回报图。恰好是,Lam Research过去5年的TSR为311%,超过了之前提到的股价回报。这在很大程度上是其股息支付的结果!
A Different Perspective
不同的观点
Lam Research shareholders gained a total return of 21% during the year. But that return falls short of the market. It's probably a good sign that the company has an even better long term track record, having provided shareholders with an annual TSR of 33% over five years. Maybe the share price is just taking a breather while the business executes on its growth strategy. Most investors take the time to check the data on insider transactions. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
Lam Research股东在该年度获得了21%的总回报。但这一回报不及市场水平。公司在长期股东回报方面表现更好,过去五年的年度TSR为33%。也许股价只是在落实其增长策略时休整一下。大多数投资者都会花时间检查内部交易数据。您可以点击这里查看内部人是否买入或卖出。
If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.
如果您愿意查看另一家公司(具有潜在的更好财务状况),请不要错过这个免费的公司列表,证明它们可以增长收益。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
请注意,本文所引述的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。