Retail Investors Invested in Quectel Wireless Solutions Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603236) up 4.3% Last Week, Insiders Too Were Rewarded
Retail Investors Invested in Quectel Wireless Solutions Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603236) up 4.3% Last Week, Insiders Too Were Rewarded
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Quectel Wireless Solutions by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 45% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders own 24% of Quectel Wireless Solutions
- 零售投资者对移远通信的重要控制意味着普通大众对管理和治理决策有更大的影响力。
- 前25大股东占45%的业务。
- 内部人拥有移远通信24%的股份。
If you want to know who really controls Quectel Wireless Solutions Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603236), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 53% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制着移远通信有限公司(SHSE:603236),那么你就必须看看其股东注册情况。零售投资者拥有着53%的股份,拥有该公司中的最大股份。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 4.3% price gain, insiders also received a 24% cut.
尽管上周股价上涨了4.3%,零售投资者是最受益的群体,但内部人员也获得了24%的减持。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Quectel Wireless Solutions.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了移远通信的不同股权群体。
![1724973796274](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240830/43089903-0-a9b4c50b3538176f87116c356ee3b023.webp/bigjpg)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Quectel Wireless Solutions?
机构持股给我们关于移远通信的信息。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Quectel Wireless Solutions already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Quectel Wireless Solutions' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
移远通信的股东名单上已经有了机构。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当大的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能单单依赖这个因素,因为机构有时也会犯错误的投资,就像每个人都会一样。当多个机构持有一支股票时,总会存在着他们参与的'拥挤交易'的风险。当这种交易出错时,多方可能会争相快速出售股票。这种风险在一个没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到移远通信的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更复杂的。
![1724973797614](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240830/43089903-1-5863e4cc52f333c97a41967e865561b9.webp/bigjpg)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Quectel Wireless Solutions. With a 23% stake, CEO Penghe Qian is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.6% and 2.7% of the stock.
对于Quectel Wireless Solutions,对冲基金持有的股份不多。首席执行官钱鹏和持有23%的股份,是最大的股东。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有约6.6%和2.7%的股票。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Quectel Wireless Solutions
Quectel Wireless Solutions的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Quectel Wireless Solutions Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥11b, and insiders have CN¥2.7b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看来内部持有移远通信的股票比例相当大。它的市值仅为110亿元人民币,而内部人员名下的股票总值为27亿元人民币。这是相当可观的。大多数人会说,这显示了与股东的良好契合度,尤其是在这样一家规模的公司中。您可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买卖。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 53% stake in Quectel Wireless Solutions, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通大众,通常是个人投资者,持有移远通信53%的持股比例,这意味着这是一只相当受欢迎的股票。这种所有权规模给予了普通大众一些集体的权力。他们可以并且很可能影响董事会对高管薪酬、股息政策和拟议的企业收购等决策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 8.1%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有该公司8.1%的股份。私人公司可能是相关方。有时内部人员通过控股私人公司而不是作为个人参与公众公司。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意作为进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我总是喜欢查看营业收入增长的历史记录,你也可以免费访问这个详细图表中的历史营收和收益图表。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。