share_log

After Losing 19% in the Past Year, UiPath Inc. (NYSE:PATH) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 19% in the Past Year, UiPath Inc. (NYSE:PATH) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

在过去的一年里下跌19%之后,UiPath Inc. (纽交所:PATH) 的机构投资者对最近的涨幅应该松了一口气。
Simply Wall St ·  08/30 10:17

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, UiPath's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in UiPath is 20%
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,UiPath的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 50% 的业务由前 11 名股东持有
  • UiPath 的内部所有权为 20%

To get a sense of who is truly in control of UiPath Inc. (NYSE:PATH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了UiPath Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:PATH),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有57%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 6.5% increase in the share price after a year of 19% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

机构投资者可能会欢迎上周股价在连续下跌19%之后上涨6.5%,这表明回报率可能开始呈上升趋势。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about UiPath.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于UiPath的什么。

1725027434341
NYSE:PATH Ownership Breakdown August 30th 2024
纽约证券交易所:PATH 所有权明细 2024 年 8 月 30 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UiPath?

关于UiPath,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

We can see that UiPath does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of UiPath, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,UiPath确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下UiPath过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

1725027435465
NYSE:PATH Earnings and Revenue Growth August 30th 2024
纽约证券交易所:PATH 收益和收入增长 2024 年 8 月 30 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in UiPath. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Daniel Dines with 19% of shares outstanding. With 7.5% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and ARK Investment Management LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对UiPath进行有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是首席执行官丹尼尔·迪恩斯,其已发行股份的19%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和ArK投资管理有限责任公司分别拥有7.5%和5.2%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的所有权数据就会发现,前11名股东的合并所有权为50%,这意味着没有一个股东拥有多数股东。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of UiPath

UiPath 的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in UiPath Inc.. Insiders own US$1.4b worth of shares in the US$7.2b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有UiPath Inc.的大量股份。内部人士拥有这家价值72亿美元的公司价值14亿美元的股份。这很有意义。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您不妨访问这张显示内部人士近期交易的免费图表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司23%的股份,因此不容易被忽视。尽管这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for UiPath that you should be aware of before investing here.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了 UiPath 的 3 个警告信号,在投资之前,您应该注意这些信号。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发