share_log

Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of Humacyte, Inc. (NASDAQ:HUMA) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 14% Decrease

Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of Humacyte, Inc. (NASDAQ:HUMA) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 14% Decrease

控制Humacyte,Inc. (纳斯达克:HUMA)相当大比例股份的零售投资者和机构,在上周的14%下跌之后都感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  08/31 08:18

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant control over Humacyte by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 20 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 零售投资者对Humacyte的重要控制意味着普通大众在影响管理和治理决策方面拥有更多权力
  • 前20大股东持有该公司50%的股份。
  • 内部人员最近一直在买入。

If you want to know who really controls Humacyte, Inc. (NASDAQ:HUMA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 44% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想要知道谁真正控制着Humacyte,Inc.(纳斯达克:HUMA),那么您就需要查看其股东登记册的构成。 拥有最大股份的是零售投资者,他们拥有44%的所有权。 换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 14% price drop, institutions with their 26% holdings also suffered.

在上周的14%价格下跌后,散户的持有量受到了打击,持有26%的机构也遭受了损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Humacyte, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入了解Humacyte的每一种所有者,首先从下面的图表开始。

1725106713732
NasdaqGS:HUMA Ownership Breakdown August 31st 2024
NasdaqGS:HUMA所有权拆分2024年8月31日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Humacyte?

机构所有权告诉我们关于Humacyte的什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Humacyte does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Humacyte's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到Humacyte确实拥有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司股票的一部分。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅凭这个事实来进行判断,因为机构有时也会犯错误投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在它们可能处于“众多交易”的风险。当这种交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到Humacyte的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更复杂。

1725106715028
NasdaqGS:HUMA Earnings and Revenue Growth August 31st 2024
纳斯达克GS:HUMA的收益和营业收入增长2024年8月31日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Humacyte. Fresenius Medical Care AG is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. Gavril Yushvaev is the second largest shareholder owning 7.5% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 6.0% of the company stock.

对于Humacyte,对冲基金不持有太多股份。费森尤斯医疗有限公司目前是该公司最大的股东,持有15%的流通股份。Gavril Yushvaev是第二大股东,持有7.5%的普通股股票,而BlackRock, Inc.持有约6.0%的公司股票。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 20 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们所有权数据的进一步观察表明,前20大股东持有50%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of Humacyte

Humacyte的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Humacyte, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$73m worth of stock in the US$734m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据显示,内部人员持有Humacyte, Inc.的一些股票。在他们自己的名字下,内部人员持有总值7300万美元的股票,占据了总值73400万美元的公司的一部分股份。这至少表明了一些对齐。您可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在购买或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 44% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

大众,包括零售投资者,拥有该公司44%的股份,因此不容易被忽视。尽管占有率相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能不能改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 4.8%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到,私营公司拥有发行股份的4.8%。 这可能值得进一步研究。 如果类似内部人士的相关方在这些私营公司中投资,这应在年度报告中披露。 私营公司对公司可能也有战略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

It appears to us that public companies own 15% of Humacyte. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

我们看到,公共公司拥有Humacyte的15%。 这可能是一种战略利益,这两家公司可能有相关业务利益。 可能是它们进行了拆分。 这个持股可能值得进一步调查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 6 warning signs we've spotted with Humacyte (including 3 which are concerning) .

我发现研究公司的真正拥有者非常有趣。 但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 为此,您应该了解我们在Humacyte中发现的6个警示信号(包括3个令人担忧的信号)

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发