AbbVie Inc. (NYSE:ABBV) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 73% of the Company
AbbVie Inc. (NYSE:ABBV) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 73% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in AbbVie implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 46% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 机构对艾伯维公司的大量持股意味着他们对公司的股价具有重大影响力。
- 公司分为25个投资者,共拥有46%的股份。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
Every investor in AbbVie Inc. (NYSE:ABBV) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 73% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
任何AbbVie Inc. (纽交所: ABBV)的投资者都应该注意最有影响力的股东群体。机构持有公司的73%股份,占全公司股份的最大比例。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因为机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往带有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者来说。因此,机构投资在一家公司中的大量资金通常被视为一个积极因素。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about AbbVie.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对艾伯维公司的意义。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AbbVie?
机构持股对AbbVie有何影响?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that AbbVie does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at AbbVie's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到艾伯维公司确实拥有机构投资者;并且他们持有公司的一部分股票。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票并喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果多个机构在同一时间改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,查看艾伯维公司的历史收益数据还是很有价值的。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in AbbVie. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.7% of shares outstanding. With 7.7% and 4.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders.
投资者应注意到,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司股份,因此他们可以集体行使重要权力。我们注意到对AbbVie没有一家对冲基金进行有意义的投资。目前,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是公司最大的股东,持有9.7%的流通股。BlackRock, Inc.和Capital Research and Management Company分别持有7.7%和4.7%的流通股,为第二和第三大股东。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of AbbVie
艾伯维公司内部人士持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of AbbVie Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$306m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
根据我们的数据,艾伯维公司内部人士的持股比例不到1%。由于该公司规模庞大,我们并不希望内部人士持有大量的股份。他们共持有价值30600万美元的股票。看到至少有一些内部人士持股总是好的,但可能值得检查一下是否有内部人士出售股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in AbbVie. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般来说,通常是个体投资者的公众持有艾伯维公司27%的股份。尽管这一持股比例相当可观,但如果其决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 5 warning signs for AbbVie you should know about.
我发现查看公司所有人非常有趣。但是要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,要考虑风险。每个公司都有风险,我们已经发现了艾伯维公司的5个警告信号,你应该知道。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。