share_log

With 87% Ownership, Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE:YUM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 87% Ownership, Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE:YUM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

拥有87%的股权,Yum!品牌公司(NYSE:YUM)享有强大的机构支持
Simply Wall St ·  09/01 09:52

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Yum! Brands implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 7 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 纽交所(Yum! Brands)的机构巨大持股意味着他们对公司的股价有重要影响力。
  • 前7大股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE:YUM) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

观察Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE:YUM)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最具有影响力。占主导地位的是拥有87%股份的机构。换句话说,这个集团在投资公司时最能获得最多的利益(或损失最大的利益)

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Yum! Brands.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了Yum! Brands的不同所有权群体。

1725198738871
NYSE:YUM Ownership Breakdown September 1st 2024
纽交所:YUm所有权分布2024年9月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Yum! Brands?

机构持股告诉我们关于Yum! Brands的什么信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Yum! Brands does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Yum! Brands, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到Yum! Brands确实拥有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的一大部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉。然而,最好不要过分依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,很常见看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查Yum! Brands的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

1725198740203
NYSE:YUM Earnings and Revenue Growth September 1st 2024
纽交所:YUm收入和收入增长2024年9月1日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Yum! Brands is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Capital Research and Management Company is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 8.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有该公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以集体行使重要权力。Yum!品牌不是由对冲基金持有的。我们的数据显示,资本研究和管理公司是持有13%流通股的最大股东。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股的12%和8.4%。

We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前7名股东拥有超过一半的股份登记册,还有一些小股东来平衡较大股东的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of Yum! Brands

Yum!品牌的内部股权所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our information suggests that Yum! Brands, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$55m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的信息表明,百胜餐饮集团股份有限公司的内部持有不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此如果内部持有大比例的股份,可能会令人吃惊。尽管他们持有的股份不足1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员集体持有价值5500万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到至少有一些内部持有股份总是件好事,但值得注意的是,可能值得检查这些内部人是否一直在卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投资者在内的公众持有公司的13%股权,因此不能被轻易忽略。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以在他们有利时推动政策决策,但他们仍可以共同影响公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Yum! Brands (2 are significant) that you should be aware of.

我发现查看公司的实际所有人非常有趣。但要真正获取洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了百胜餐饮集团的4个警告信号(其中2个是重要的),您应该注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发