share_log

InMode Ltd. (NASDAQ:INMD) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 58% Loss Over the Past Year

InMode Ltd. (NASDAQ:INMD) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 58% Loss Over the Past Year

纳斯达克上市公司InMode有限公司(纳斯达克股票代码:INMD)的机构投资者可能会对近年来的大幅收益感到满意,在过去一年中曾有58%的损失。
Simply Wall St ·  09/02 06:18

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in InMode implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 机构在inmode股票上的大量持股意味着他们对该公司的股价有重大影响力。
  • 公司前25位股东持有50%的业务。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of InMode Ltd. (NASDAQ:INMD) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 64% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

研究InMode有限公司(NASDAQ:INMD)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。而持有最多股份的群体是机构,占有64%的股权。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上升潜力(或下降风险)。

After a year of 58% losses, last week's 3.9% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.

经过一年的58%损失后,上周的3.9%收益对机构投资者来说可能是一个好消息,可能意味着回报率可能开始上升。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of InMode.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了InMode的不同所有权组。

big
NasdaqGS:INMD Ownership Breakdown September 2nd 2024
纳斯达克(INMD)的所有权结构于2024年9月2日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About InMode?

机构所有权告诉我们关于InMode的什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in InMode. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see InMode's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在InMode股票中有相当大的股份。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经研究过这只股票,并且喜欢它。但是就像其他人一样,他们也有可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,存在着它们参与的'拥挤交易'的风险。当这样的交易出错时,可能会有多方竞相快速抛售股票。在没有历史增长记录的公司中,这种风险更大。您可以在下面看到InMode的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多的内容。

big
NasdaqGS:INMD Earnings and Revenue Growth September 2nd 2024
纳斯达克科技:inmode收益和营业收入增长2024年9月2日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. InMode is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 7.6% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 3.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Michael Kreindel, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Technology Officer. Furthermore, CEO Moshe Mizrahy is the owner of 2.4% of the company's shares.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司股份,因此他们可以集体行使重要的权力。inmode不是由避险基金所拥有的。我们的数据显示,黑石集团是最大的股东,拥有7.6%的流通股。作为背景,第二大股东持有约3.7%的流通股,第三大股东持有3.5%的股份。同时,第二大股东迈克尔·克雷因德尔还兼任首席技术官。此外,首席执行官莫西·米兹拉希拥有公司股份的2.4%。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of InMode

InMode的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in InMode Ltd.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$137m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以报告,InMode Ltd.的内部人员拥有股份。这些内部人员持有价值1,3700万美元的实质性股份。大多数人都会把这看作是一个真正的积极因素。看到内部人员进行这种程度的投资是一件好事。您可以在此处查看内部人员最近是否有购买。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众,包括散户投资者,拥有公司的26%股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这样的所有权规模可能不足以在他们的利益中影响一项政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我总是喜欢查看营业收入增长的历史记录,你也可以免费访问这个详细图表中的历史营收和收益图表。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发