share_log

Insiders the Biggest Winners as Zhejiang Langdi Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603726) Market Cap Rises to CN¥2.9b

Insiders the Biggest Winners as Zhejiang Langdi Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603726) Market Cap Rises to CN¥2.9b

内部人成为朗迪集团股份有限公司(SHSE:603726)市值上升至2.9亿元的最大获益者。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/09/04 10:26

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Zhejiang Langdi Group's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • 53% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Yankang Gao)
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 内部人士似乎对浙江朗迪集团的增长抱有极大兴趣,这可以从他们所拥有的大量股权中看出
  • 该公司53%的股份由一个股东(高延康)持有
  • 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。

A look at the shareholders of Zhejiang Langdi Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603726) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 64% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下浙江朗迪集团股份有限公司(SHSE:603726)的股东,就可以知道哪个集团更有权势。个别内部股东持有公司的最大股份,占据64%的股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最多)

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥529m last week.

显然,内部人士是在公司市值上周上升了52900万元之后获益最多的。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Zhejiang Langdi Group.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对朗迪集团可以告诉我们什么。

big
SHSE:603726 Ownership Breakdown September 4th 2024
SHSE:603726 2024年9月4日所有权份额细分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Langdi Group?

机构持股对朗迪集团有什么作用?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

Institutions have a very small stake in Zhejiang Langdi Group. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.

机构对朗迪集团拥有的股权份额很小,这表明公司目前受到一些基金的关注,但与专业投资者的关注度并不特别高。如果公司从这里变得更强大,可能会出现更多机构愿意购买的情况。当多个机构投资者同时试图买入股票时,股价大幅上涨并不罕见。因此,请查看下面的历史收益轨迹,但请记住,未来的发展才最重要。

big
SHSE:603726 Earnings and Revenue Growth September 4th 2024
SHSE:603726的收益和营业收入增长,截至2024年9月4日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Zhejiang Langdi Group. Yankang Gao is currently the company's largest shareholder with 53% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Feng Quan Li is the second largest shareholder owning 4.8% of common stock, and Sai Qiu Chen holds about 2.0% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Wen Ming Gao directly holds 1.1% of the total shares outstanding.

我们注意到,对于浙江朗迪集团,对冲基金没有实质性的投资。现任公司最大股东为高延康,持有53%的流通股份。这意味着他们对公司的未来具有绝对的控制利益权。李冯权是第二大股东,持有4.8%的普通股,陈塞秋持有公司2.0%的股份。此外,公司的首席执行官高文明直接持有总流通股份的1.1%。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。分析师观点也可以达到相同的目的。我们的信息表明,这只股票没有任何分析师覆盖,所以它可能不是很出名。

Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Langdi Group

浙江朗迪集团的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Zhejiang Langdi Group Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own CN¥1.9b worth of shares in the CN¥2.9b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

看起来内部人员拥有浙江朗迪集团股份超过一半。这使他们拥有很大的权力。这意味着他们拥有29亿人民币公司中价值19亿人民币的股份。这相当有意义。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。您可以在这里查看内部人员最近是否有购买。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in Zhejiang Langdi Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公众通常是个人投资者,在浙江朗迪集团中持有32%的股份。尽管这个持股比例相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Zhejiang Langdi Group , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我觉得看谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,投资风险这个永恒的幽灵。我们已经发现了浙江朗迪集团的1个预警信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然,这也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我们免费的潜力股票收藏,这些股票具有有利的财务状况。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发