share_log

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, Ameren Corporation (NYSE:AEE) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, Ameren Corporation (NYSE:AEE) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

拥有80%的股权,美能公司(纽交所:AEE)受机构投资者严重主导
Simply Wall St ·  09/04 07:53

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Ameren implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 机构对阿曼瑞恩的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响力
  • 一共有11个投资者拥有该公司50%的所有权。
  • 内部人员最近一直在卖出。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ameren Corporation (NYSE:AEE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 80% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正掌控着阿曼瑞恩公司(纽交所:AEE),了解企业的所有权结构至关重要。而持有最大比例的是机构,占据了80%的所有权。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该机构将获得最大的利益(或者如果出现下跌则损失最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ameren, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨阿曼瑞恩的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
NYSE:AEE Ownership Breakdown September 4th 2024
纽交所:AEE所有权拆分2024年9月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ameren?

机构所有权对阿曼瑞恩有何影响?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ameren. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ameren's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所见,机构投资者在阿曼瑞恩拥有大量持股。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好对依赖于机构投资者所谓的认可保持警惕。他们也有时会犯错。当多个机构持有一只股票时,存在它们参与的“过度交易”风险。当这样的交易出错时,多个交易方可能竞相快速抛售股票。这种风险在一个没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到阿曼瑞恩的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更多。

big
NYSE:AEE Earnings and Revenue Growth September 4th 2024
纽交所:AEE收入和营业收入增长2024年9月4日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Ameren. The company's largest shareholder is T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., with ownership of 14%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 7.2% of the company stock.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,公司董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。我们注意到对阿曼瑞恩来说,基金并没有实质性的投资。该公司最大的股东是t. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,持有14%的股权。第二大股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有公司普通股的13%,BlackRock, Inc.持有公司股份的约7.2%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股东登记册,我们发现其中 50% 的所有权受前11位股东控制,这意味着没有单一股东掌握所有权益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of Ameren

阿曼瑞恩的内部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our information suggests that Ameren Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$92m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

根据我们的信息,阿曼瑞恩公司的内部人士持有的股份不到1%。由于它是一家大公司,我们只期望内部人士持有很少的股份。但值得注意的是,他们持有价值9200万美元的股份。看到至少有一些内部股权是好事,但值得检查这些内部人士是否一直在卖出股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

我觉得研究谁真正拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该意识到Lazard存在3个警告信号。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Ameren (1 shouldn't be ignored) that you should be aware of.

我发现了研究一家公司的实际股东是非常有趣的事情。但是为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经识别出了关于阿曼瑞恩的2个警告信号(其中1个不容忽视),你应该注意到。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发