share_log

Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NASDAQ:NAMS) After 5.1% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NASDAQ:NAMS) After 5.1% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

股权投资公司在纳斯达克上投资的NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.(纳斯达克股票代码:NAMS)遭遇5.1%的下跌,机构也遭受了损失。
Simply Wall St ·  09/04 09:03

Key Insights

主要见解

  • NewAmsterdam Pharma's significant private equity firms ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 5 shareholders own 56% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • NewAmsterdam Pharma的股权投资机构持有大量股权,这意味着该机构的股东对公司的重要决策起着影响作用。
  • 前五大股东拥有公司的56%股份。
  • 内部人士最近购买了股票。

Every investor in NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NASDAQ:NAMS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is private equity firms. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每个投资NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NASDAQ:NAMS)的投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。拥有公司最多的股份数量的群体,准确地说大约占据了47%,就是股权投资机构。换句话说,该群体在他们对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最多)的利益。

While institutions who own 29% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$1.5b last week,private equity firms took the most losses.

上周市值下跌至15亿美元后,持有29%股份的机构面临压力,私募股权公司蒙受了最大的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about NewAmsterdam Pharma.

让我们更仔细地看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于NewAmsterdam Pharma的什么情况。

big
NasdaqGM:NAMS Ownership Breakdown September 4th 2024
纳斯达克GM:NAMS 2024年9月4日的股权拆分情况

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NewAmsterdam Pharma?

机构持股告诉我们关于NewAmsterdam Pharma的什么情况?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

NewAmsterdam Pharma already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see NewAmsterdam Pharma's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

NewAmsterdam Pharma已经有机构出现在股东名册上,他们在公司拥有可观的股份。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经研究过这支股票,而且他们对它很看好。但与其他人一样,他们也可能犯错。当多个机构持有一支股票时,总会存在它们参与的风险。当这样的交易失败时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到NewAmsterdam Pharma的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更为复杂。

big
NasdaqGM:NAMS Earnings and Revenue Growth September 4th 2024
纳斯达克GM:NAMS收益和营业收入增长2024年9月4日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 8.9% of NewAmsterdam Pharma. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Frazier Life Sciences Management, LP is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 12% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Michael Davidson directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.

我们的数据显示,对冲基金持有NewAmsterdam Pharma 8.9%的股份。 这很有趣,因为对冲基金可能非常活跃和激进。 许多人寻找中期的催化剂,以推高股价。 Frazier Life Sciences Management,LP目前是最大的股东,持有14%的股份。 相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约13%和12%的股票。 另外,公司的CEO Michael Davidson直接持有总流通股的0.9%。

On looking further, we found that 56% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步调查发现,56%的股份由前5名股东持有。换句话说,这些股东在公司决策中有重要发言权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of NewAmsterdam Pharma

NewAmsterdam Pharma的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$18m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最近的数据显示,内部人士在NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.拥有一些股份。内部人士持有价值1800万美元的有意义的股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会利益的一致性。但是,值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在抛售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over NewAmsterdam Pharma. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

拥有11%的股权,一般公众,主要是个人投资者,对NewAmsterdam Pharma有一定影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以左右政策决定向他们的有利,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With a stake of 47%, private equity firms could influence the NewAmsterdam Pharma board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司持有47%的股份,可能会影响NewAmsterdam Pharma的董事会。有些人可能会喜欢这一点,因为私募股权有时是激进派,能够要求管理层负责任。但有时,私募股权会卖出股份,使公司上市。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand NewAmsterdam Pharma better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for NewAmsterdam Pharma you should be aware of.

值得考虑不同群体持有公司股票的情况,但要更好地了解NewAmsterdam Pharma,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。举例来说:我们发现了NewAmsterdam Pharma的2个风险警示信号,您需要注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发