share_log

Recent 5.4% Pullback Would Hurt FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) Insiders

Recent 5.4% Pullback Would Hurt FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) Insiders

最近的5.4%回调将对FLEX LNG有限公司(纽交所:FLNG)内部人员造成伤害。
Simply Wall St ·  09/04 13:05

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant insider control over FLEX LNG implies vested interests in company growth
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in FLEX LNG is 23%
  • FLEX LNG的重要内部控制意味着对公司增长的利益
  • 前四大股东持有公司50%的股份。
  • FLEX LNG的机构持股为23%

A look at the shareholders of FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下FLEX LNG Ltd.(纽交所:FLNG)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有实力。我们可以看到个别内部人持有该公司的大部分股权,拥有44%的所有权。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And following last week's 5.4% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

在上周股价下跌5.4%后,内部人员遭受了最大的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of FLEX LNG.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了flex lng的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:FLNG Ownership Breakdown September 4th 2024
纽交所:FLNG所有权拆分2024年9月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FLEX LNG?

机构投资者持有FLEX LNG有何含义?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in FLEX LNG. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see FLEX LNG's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在flex lng中拥有相当大比例的股权。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的公信力。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为有时机构也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。当多家机构持有一只股票时,总会存在他们处于“拥挤交易”中的风险。当这样一笔交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到flex lng的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事里总是有更多内容。

big
NYSE:FLNG Earnings and Revenue Growth September 4th 2024
纽交所:flex lng的收益和营业收入增长2024年9月4日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in FLEX LNG. The company's largest shareholder is John Fredriksen, with ownership of 43%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.9% and 2.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我们注意到对于flex lng这家公司,对冲基金并没有重大投资。该公司最大的股东是约翰·弗雷德里克森,持有43%的股份。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有股份未流通的2.9%和2.4%。

On looking further, we found that 50% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步观察发现,前4大股东持有50%的股份。换句话说,这些股东在公司决策中具有重要的发言权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of FLEX LNG

FLEX LNG的内部人员持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of FLEX LNG Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.4b, and insiders have US$626m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据显示,内部持有合理比例的flex lng有限公司。其市值仅为14亿美元,内部持有自己名下价值62600万美元的股份。这相当显著。大多数人会说,这显示出与股东的良好一致性,尤其是在这样规模的公司中。您可以点击这里查看这些内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over FLEX LNG. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有34%股权的广大公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对flex lng拥有一定的影响力。尽管这一群体不一定能左右决策,但肯定可以对公司的运行产生实质性影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - FLEX LNG has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我发现查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们也需要考虑其他信息。例如,看看风险 - flex lng 有 2 个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发