Private Companies in China Galaxy Securities Co., Ltd. (HKG:6881) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 5.2% Last Week
Private Companies in China Galaxy Securities Co., Ltd. (HKG:6881) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 5.2% Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in China Galaxy Securities indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 3 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Institutional ownership in China Galaxy Securities is 12%
- 中国银河证券由私人公司拥有的大量股权表明,它们共同在管理和业务策略方面拥有更大的发言权
- 前三大股东拥有公司51%的股份。
- 中国银河证券的机构持股比例为12%
To get a sense of who is truly in control of China Galaxy Securities Co., Ltd. (HKG:6881), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解中国银河证券股份有限公司(HKG:6881)真正控制权的分布,重要的是了解企业的所有权结构。在该公司中拥有最多股份的集团,准确地说是约50%,是私人公司。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Clearly, private companies benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by HK$2.2b last week.
显然,上个星期公司市值上涨22亿港币后,私营公司受益最大。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of China Galaxy Securities, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解中国银河证券的每一类型股东,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Galaxy Securities?
机构持股告诉我们有关中国银河证券的什么信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
China Galaxy Securities already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at China Galaxy Securities' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
中国银河证券已经有机构在股东名册上。事实上,它们在公司拥有相当大的股份。 这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票,而且他们对它很看好。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看一看中国银河证券下面的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in China Galaxy Securities. China Galaxy Financial Holdings Company Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 47% of shares outstanding. Wenze International Investment Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 2.0% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 1.6% of the company stock.
我们注意到对中国银河证券没有有意义的投资的对冲基金。中国银河金融控股有限公司是目前该公司的最大股东,持有47%的流通股。文泽国际投资有限公司是第二大股东,拥有2.0%的普通股,而美国先锋集团持有该公司股份的约1.6%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
总的来说,包括散户投资者在内,公众拥有公司的14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of China Galaxy Securities
中国银河证券的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. We do not see this low level of ownership often, and it is possible our data is imperfect. But shareholders can click here to check if insiders have been selling stock.
我们的数据无法证实董事会成员是否持有个人股份。我们很少看到这种低水平的持股,我们的数据可能不完全正确。但是股东可以单击此处查看内部人是否出售了股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 38% stake in China Galaxy Securities. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
通常个体投资者的大众持有中国银河证券38%的股份。虽然这样的持股规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能无法改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 50%, of the China Galaxy Securities stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
中国银河证券股份的50%被私人公司所拥有。 私人公司可能是相关方。 有时内部人通过持有私人公司的股权而对上市公司产生兴趣,而不是以个人的身份。 虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意作为进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand China Galaxy Securities better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with China Galaxy Securities (including 1 which is a bit unpleasant) .
始终值得考虑不同的股东群体。 但要更好地了解中国银河证券,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 为此,您应该了解我们在中国银河证券发现的3个警示信号(其中有一个令人不快)。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。