share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook Zions Bancorporation, National Association's (NASDAQ:ZION) Recent US$294m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook Zions Bancorporation, National Association's (NASDAQ:ZION) Recent US$294m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

长期来看,机构投资者可能忽视了Zions Bancorporation, National Association (纳斯达克:ZION) 最近2,9400万美元市值下跌,但长期收益仍然是积极的。
Simply Wall St ·  09/05 08:08

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Zions Bancorporation National Association implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 机构在锡恩斯银行全国协会的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价具有重要影响
  • 前15大股东拥有该公司50%的股份。
  • 内部人员最近一直在卖出。

Every investor in Zions Bancorporation, National Association (NASDAQ:ZION) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 79% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

纳斯达克(纳斯达克:锡恩)的每位投资者都应该了解最有影响力的股东团体。拥有该公司股份最多的团体,准确地说是大约79%的股份,是机构。换句话说,这个团体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$294m last week. However, the 41% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上周,该公司的市值下跌了2.94亿美元,机构投资者遭受了最高的损失。然而,41%的年回报率可能有助于缓解他们的总体损失。然而,他们应该注意未来可能进一步的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zions Bancorporation National Association.

在下面的图表中,我们放大查看Zions Bancorporation National Association的不同所有权群体。

big
NasdaqGS:ZION Ownership Breakdown September 5th 2024
纳斯达克GS:ZION 2024年9月5日的所有权分布

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zions Bancorporation National Association?

机构投资者所有权告诉我们关于Zions Bancorporation National Association的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Zions Bancorporation National Association does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Zions Bancorporation National Association's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到Zions Bancorporation National Association确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有该公司的大部分股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界享有一定的信誉。然而,要谨慎依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会犯错。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在着他们参与了一个“拥挤的交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多个方将可能竞相快速抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以查看Zions Bancorporation National Association的历史收益和营业收入,但要记住故事总是更加复杂的。

big
NasdaqGS:ZION Earnings and Revenue Growth September 5th 2024
纳斯达克GS:ZION盈利和营业收入增长2024年9月5日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Zions Bancorporation National Association. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.2% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Harris Simmons is the owner of 1.1% of the company's shares.

投资者应该注意,实际上有超过一半的股份由机构持有,因此他们可以集体行使重大权力。我们注意到,对于Zions Bancorporation National Association,对冲基金没有实质性的投资。我们的数据显示,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股东,持有12%的流通股份。为了提供背景,第二大股东持有约9.0%的流通股份,第三大股东持有4.2%的股份。此外,首席执行官Harris Simmons是公司股份的拥有者,持有1.1%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前15名股东在公司中拥有50%的组合持股,这表明没有单一的股东对公司拥有重大控制权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Zions Bancorporation National Association

Zions Bancorporation National Association的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Zions Bancorporation, National Association. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$148m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股东可能会对蔡仁银行国家协会拥有股份感兴趣。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的巨大利益是一件积极的事情。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约14800万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。大多数人会说,这表明了股东和董事会之间的利益一致。不过,值得检查一下那些内部人员是否一直在抛售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Zions Bancorporation National Association. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公众通常是个体投资者,在蔡仁银行国家协会持有19%的股份。虽然这个群体不能说了算,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实质性影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Zions Bancorporation National Association better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Zions Bancorporation National Association .

始终值得考虑拥有一家公司股份的不同群体。但要更好地了解美国石安山大通银行国民协会,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 为此,您应该了解我们在美国石安山大通银行国民协会发现的1个警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发