share_log

Lazard, Inc.'s (NYSE:LAZ) Institutional Investors Lost 3.6% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Lazard, Inc.'s (NYSE:LAZ) Institutional Investors Lost 3.6% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Lazard, Inc.(纽交所: LAZ)的机构投资者上周亏损了3.6%,但从长期收益中受益。
Simply Wall St ·  09/06 07:53

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Lazard implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 机构在Lazard的大量持股意味着他们对公司的股票价格有重要的影响。
  • 前9大股东持有该公司50%的股份。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Lazard, Inc. (NYSE:LAZ), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 86% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

为了了解谁真正控制着Lazard公司(NYSE:LAZ),重要的是了解该公司的所有制结构。拥有86%股权的机构持有着公司的最大股份。换句话说,该机构面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$162m last week. However, the 54% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上周该公司市值下跌了16200万美元,使得机构投资者遭受了最大损失。然而,54%的年度回报可能有助于减轻他们的总体损失。但他们可能会对未来的损失保持警惕。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lazard.

在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于Lazard的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:LAZ Ownership Breakdown September 6th 2024
纽交所(NYSE):套現分析师所有权下降2024年9月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lazard?

机构所有权能告诉我们有关Lazard的什么?Lazard已经有机构投资者在股东名册上。他们确实拥有公司中相当大的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但是,我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会像所有人一样做出糟糕的投资。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,通常会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查Lazard的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,还需要考虑其他因素。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

Lazard already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lazard's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Lazard已经有机构投资者在股权登记册上。实际上,他们在该公司拥有可观的股权。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得关注的是Lazard的盈利历史,当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:LAZ Earnings and Revenue Growth September 6th 2024
纽交所:LAZ的收入和营业收入增长情况 2024年9月6日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Lazard is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

机构投资者拥有超过50%的股份,所以他们可能能够强烈影响董事会的决策。Lazard不是由对冲基金所拥有的。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股东,持有12%的流通股份。作为背景,第二大股东持有约11%的流通股份,第三大股东持有8.7%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了更多挖掘,发现前九大股东占注册资本的大约50%,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有少数小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Lazard

Lazard的内部股东权益。股东可能会对于Lazard的内部股权有兴趣。这是一个大公司,因此看到这种程度的协调是很好的。内部人员拥有价值1.37亿美元的股份(按照当前价格)。如果您想了解内部人员的协调水平,可以点击此处查看他们是否一直在买入或卖出。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Lazard, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$127m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股东可能会对知道内部人士在Lazard, Inc.持有股份感兴趣。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的有意义的一致性通常是一个积极的迹象。在这种情况下,他们大约拥有价值约12700万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。 大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间有利益一致性。不过,值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在抛售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

广大公众——包括零售投资者——在公司中拥有11%的持股,因此不能被轻视。虽然这个群体不能决定掌控权,但它确实可以对公司的运营产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lazard better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Lazard .

始终值得思考的是拥有一家公司股份的不同群体。但是为了更好地了解Lazard,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您需要了解我们在Lazard中发现的4个警示信号。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发