We Think Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
We Think Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Columbus McKinnon Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCO) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
正如Howard Marks所说,与其担心股价波动性,"可能的永久性亏损是我担心的风险...我认识的每一位实际投资者也都很担心。"因此,明智的投资者知道,债务(通常涉及破产)是评估一家公司风险程度时非常重要的因素。重要的是,Columbus McKinnon Corporation(纳斯达克:CMCO)确实承担了债务。但更重要的问题是:这种债务造成了多大的风险?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
债务何时有危险?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
债务可以帮助业务发展,直到业务遇到瓶颈,无法通过新资本或自由现金流来偿还债务。最坏的情况是,公司无法偿还债务,随后破产。然而,更常见的(但仍然痛苦)情况是以低价发行新股权资本,从而永久稀释股东的权益。当然,债务的好处是通常代表了廉价资本,特别是当它在一家公司中代替了股权稀释,有能力以高回报率进行再投资。当我们考虑债务水平时,首先考虑现金和债务水平,二者结合在一起。
How Much Debt Does Columbus McKinnon Carry?
哥伦布-麦金农承担了多少债务?
As you can see below, Columbus McKinnon had US$499.5m of debt at June 2024, down from US$570.8m a year prior. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$74.2m, its net debt is less, at about US$425.3m.
正如下面所示,截至2024年6月,Columbus McKinnon的债务为499.5百万美元,低于一年前的570.8百万美元。然而,由于其现金储备为74.2百万美元,其净债务较低,约为425.3百万美元。
How Strong Is Columbus McKinnon's Balance Sheet?
哥伦布-麦金农的资产负债表有多强?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Columbus McKinnon had liabilities of US$231.5m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$664.3m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$74.2m in cash and US$171.2m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$650.5m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
从最新的资产负债表可以看出,哥伦布-麦金农的短期负债为2.315亿美元,长期负债为6.643亿美元。此外,它有7.42亿美元的现金和1.712亿美元的应收账款,这些账款在12个月内到期。因此,它的负债总额比现金和近期应收账款多6.505亿美元。
This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$928.4m. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.
相对于其市值为9.284亿美元,这是一个巨大的杠杆。如果债权人要求它加强资产负债表,股东可能面临严重稀释。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我们使用两个主要的比率来告诉我们相对于收益的债务水平。第一个是净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前利润(EBITDA),而第二个是其利润前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖其利息费用的次数(或其利息覆盖率,简称)。因此,我们考虑与折旧和摊销费用相关的盈利以及没有相关费用的盈利相对于债务水平。
Columbus McKinnon's debt is 2.8 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 3.0 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Fortunately, Columbus McKinnon grew its EBIT by 8.3% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Columbus McKinnon's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
哥伦布-麦金农的债务是其息税折旧摊销前利润的2.8倍,利息费用的覆盖倍数为3.0倍。这表明虽然债务水平相当可观,但我们不会称其为问题。幸运的是,哥伦布-麦金农去年将其息税折旧摊销前利润增长了8.3%,相对于收益而言,其债务在缓慢减少。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中获得了关于债务的大部分信息。但与任何事物相比,未来的收益将决定哥伦布-麦金农能否保持健康的资产负债表。因此,如果你关注未来,你可以查看这份显示分析师盈利预测的免费报告。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Columbus McKinnon's free cash flow amounted to 49% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最后,虽然税务部门可能喜欢会计利润,但债权人只接受切实的现金。因此,我们总是检查该息税折旧摊销前利润被转换为自由现金流的金额。在过去三年中,哥伦布-麦金农的自由现金流占其息税折旧摊销前利润的49%,低于我们的预期。这种较弱的现金转换使处理债务更加困难。
Our View
我们的观点
While Columbus McKinnon's level of total liabilities makes us cautious about it, its track record of covering its interest expense with its EBIT is no better. But its not so bad at growing its EBIT. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Columbus McKinnon is taking some risks with its use of debt. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Columbus McKinnon is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
尽管哥伦布-麦金农的总负债水平令我们谨慎,但其用基本利润(EBIt)支付利息的记录并不好。但是,它在增长EBIt方面并不那么糟糕。当我们考虑到所有这些讨论的因素时,我们认为哥伦布-麦金农在债务使用方面存在一些风险。虽然债务可以增加回报,但我们认为公司现在已经有足够的杠杆。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。然而,并非所有的投资风险都在资产负债表中 - 远非如此。请注意,哥伦布-麦金农在我们的投资分析中显示出1个警示信号,您应该了解...
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
如果在所有这些之后,您更感兴趣的是具有坚实资产负债表的快速增长公司,那么不要拖延,查看我们的净现金增长股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。