Is Kingboard Holdings (HKG:148) Using Too Much Debt?
Is Kingboard Holdings (HKG:148) Using Too Much Debt?
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Kingboard Holdings Limited (HKG:148) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
有些人说,作为投资者,比起债务,波动性才是最好的风险思考方式,但是沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过'波动性远非风险的同义词'。因此,看起来聪明的投资者知道,债务(通常涉及破产)是评估公司风险的非常重要的因素。值得注意的是,金寶集團(HKG:148)确实存在债务。但是,这个债务对股东来说是一个担忧吗?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
为什么债务会带来风险?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
债务支持企业,直到企业出现困难无法偿还,无论是通过新的资本还是通过自由现金流。在最坏的情况下,如果一个公司无法偿还其债权人,它可能会破产。但是,更为常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,一个公司必须以低廉的股价稀释股东,以便控制债务。然而,通过取代稀释,债务可以成为需要资本投资高回报扩张的企业的极好工具。当我们审查债务水平时,我们首先考虑现金和债务水平。
How Much Debt Does Kingboard Holdings Carry?
金寶集團承载了多少债务?
As you can see below, Kingboard Holdings had HK$23.2b of debt, at June 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had HK$11.3b in cash, and so its net debt is HK$11.9b.
正如您可以在下面看到的,金寶集團在2024年6月份有232亿港元的债务,与前一年大致相同。您可以点击图表以查看更详细的信息。然而,它也有113亿港元的现金,因此其净债务为119亿港元。
A Look At Kingboard Holdings' Liabilities
关于金伯利控股的负债情况
According to the last reported balance sheet, Kingboard Holdings had liabilities of HK$19.8b due within 12 months, and liabilities of HK$15.0b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of HK$11.3b as well as receivables valued at HK$12.7b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by HK$10.8b.
根据上次披露的资产负债表,金伯利控股的短期负债为198亿港元,长期负债为150亿港元。 抵消这些义务,其现金为113亿港元,应收账款为127亿港元,均在12个月内到期。 因此,其负债超过了现金和(短期)应收账款的总和108亿港元。
This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of HK$17.1b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Kingboard Holdings' use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
相对于其市值171亿港元,这个赤字相当可观,因此确实提示股东们应该密切关注金伯利控股对债务的利用情况。 这表明如果公司需要迅速健全其资产负债表,股东们将面临严重稀释。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我们通过查看净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比以及计算其利息支出由收益前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖的程度来度量一家公司的债务负载相对于其收益能力的程度。此方法的优点在于我们同时考虑了债务的绝对量(以净债务为EBITDA)以及与该债务相关的实际利息支出(以其利息覆盖倍数计算)。
Kingboard Holdings's net debt is sitting at a very reasonable 1.8 times its EBITDA, while its EBIT covered its interest expense just 4.7 times last year. While that doesn't worry us too much, it does suggest the interest payments are somewhat of a burden. We saw Kingboard Holdings grow its EBIT by 2.5% in the last twelve months. Whilst that hardly knocks our socks off it is a positive when it comes to debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Kingboard Holdings can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
金伯利控股的净债务相对其EBITDA非常合理,为1.8倍,而其EBIt去年仅覆盖了利息支出的4.7倍。 虽然这并不让我们过分担忧,但确实表明利息支付在一定程度上是个负担。 我们看到金伯利控股在过去12个月内将其EBIt增长了2.5%,虽然这并没有让我们感到特别惊喜,但在处理债务方面确实是一个积极的信号。 在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是开始的明显位置。 但最终业务的未来盈利能力将决定金伯利控股是否能够长期改善其资产负债表。 因此,如果您想知道专业人士的看法,您可能会发现分析师利润预测的免费报告有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Kingboard Holdings's free cash flow amounted to 43% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最后,公司只能用实实在在的现金偿还债务,而不是会计利润。 因此,我们始终检查EBIt中有多少转化为自由现金流。 在过去三年中,金伯利控股的自由现金流占其EBIt的比例达到43%,低于我们的预期。 这种较弱的现金转化使处理负债更加困难。
Our View
我们的观点
Both Kingboard Holdings's level of total liabilities and its interest cover were discouraging. At least its net debt to EBITDA gives us reason to be optimistic. We think that Kingboard Holdings's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Kingboard Holdings is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those shouldn't be ignored...
金浦钰的总负债水平和利息覆盖率令人沮丧。 至少其净债务与息税摊销前利润比给我们带来了乐观情绪。 我们认为考虑到上述数据点,金浦钰的债务使其有些风险。 并不是所有的风险都是不好的,因为它有可能提高股价回报,但这种债务风险值得记在心里。 资产负债表是分析债务时要重点关注的领域。 然而,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表之内——远非如此。 请注意,金浦钰在我们的投资分析中显示出了2个警示信号,其中一个信号是不能被忽视的...
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有兴趣投资能够在不负债的情况下增长利润的企业,请查看这份免费列表,其中列出了在资产负债表上拥有净现金的成长型企业。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。