With 5.2% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Otter Tail Corporation's (NASDAQ:OTTR) 8.3% Stock Price Decline
With 5.2% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Otter Tail Corporation's (NASDAQ:OTTR) 8.3% Stock Price Decline
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Otter Tail's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 高机构所有权意味着 Otter Tail 的股价对其交易行为很敏感
- 共有10名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为51%
- 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有一个很好的了解
A look at the shareholders of Otter Tail Corporation (NASDAQ:OTTR) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 59% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看Otter Tail Corporation(纳斯达克股票代码:OTTR)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。机构拥有59%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 8.3% in value last week. However, the 5.2% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
没有股东喜欢在投资中蒙受损失,尤其是上周持股价值下降8.3%的机构投资者。但是,5.2%的股东一年回报率可能有助于减轻他们的痛苦。但是,我们假设他们将来会注意弱点。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Otter Tail.
在下图中,我们放大了 Otter Tail 的不同所有权组。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Otter Tail?
机构所有权告诉我们关于 Otter Tail 的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Otter Tail does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Otter Tail's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到,Otter Tail确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Otter Tail的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Otter Tail is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 8.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Charles MacFarlane is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。Otter Tail 不归对冲基金所有。贝莱德公司目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的16%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的12%和8.3%。此外,首席执行官查尔斯·麦克法兰持有该公司0.7%的股份。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前十名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。
Insider Ownership Of Otter Tail
Otter Tail 的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Otter Tail Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$69m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有Otter Tail Corporation的股份。这是一家大公司,因此很高兴看到这种一致性。内部人士拥有价值6900万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探讨内幕调整问题,可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Otter Tail. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
拥有30%所有权的公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对Otter Tail有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股权所有权
With an ownership of 8.3%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股权公司拥有8.3%的所有权,可以在制定以价值创造为重点的公司战略方面发挥作用。有时我们会看到私募股权长期存在,但总的来说,它们的投资期限较短,而且顾名思义,对上市公司的投资并不多。一段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售资本并将其重新部署到其他地方。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Otter Tail (including 1 which is potentially serious) .
尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该了解我们在 Otter Tail 中发现的 2 个警告信号(包括 1 个可能很严重的警告)。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。