With 57% Ownership, Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong) Co., Ltd (SZSE:002595) Insiders Have a Lot at Stake
With 57% Ownership, Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong) Co., Ltd (SZSE:002595) Insiders Have a Lot at Stake
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significant insider control over Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong) implies vested interests in company growth
- 51% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Institutions own 13% of Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong)
- 对豪迈机械科技(山东)的重大内部控制意味着公司增长的既得利益
- 51% 的业务由前三名股东持有
- 机构拥有豪迈机械科技(山东)13%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong) Co., Ltd (SZSE:002595), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 57% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制了豪迈机械科技(山东)有限公司(深圳证券交易所:002595),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有57%所有权的个人内部人士。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
With such a notable stake in the company, insiders would be highly incentivised to make value accretive decisions.
由于该公司持有如此可观的股份,内部人士将极大地激励他们做出增值决策。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong), beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下图开始,深入研究豪迈机械科技(山东)的每种类型的所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong)?
关于豪迈机械科技(山东),机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。
We can see that Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong) does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong), (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,豪迈机械科技(山东)确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得一看豪迈机械科技(山东)过去的收益轨迹(见下图)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong) is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Gongyun Zhang is the largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 14% and 6.7% of the stock.
豪迈机械科技(山东)不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,张公云是最大股东,已发行股份的30%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约14%和6.7%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现前三名股东共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有影响公司决策的巨大权力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong)
豪迈机械科技(山东)的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong) Co., Ltd stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of CN¥33b, that means insiders have a whopping CN¥19b worth of shares in their own names. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.
内部人士似乎拥有豪迈机械科技(山东)有限公司一半以上的股票。这赋予了他们很大的力量。鉴于其市值为330元人民币,这意味着内部人士以自己的名义拥有高达190元人民币的股票。大多数人会认为这是积极的,显示出与股东的强烈一致性。你可以点击这里查看他们是否在出售股份。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 29% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong). While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
豪迈机械科技(山东)拥有 29% 的所有权,对豪迈机械科技(山东)有一定程度的影响力,主要是个人投资者。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Himile Mechanical Science and Technology (Shandong) that you should be aware of before investing here.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了豪迈机械科技(山东)的一个警告信号,在投资这里之前,你应该注意这个信号。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。