Arrow Electronics (NYSE:ARW) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt
Arrow Electronics (NYSE:ARW) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Arrow Electronics, Inc. (NYSE:ARW) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
霍华德·马克斯很好地表达了这一点,他说,与其担心股价波动性,'永久性损失的可能性才是我担心的风险...而且我认识的每个实际投资者都会担心。'因此,当您考虑到任何给定股票的风险时,需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能会使公司陷入困境。而关键问题是,这笔债务是否使该公司变得有风险。
When Is Debt A Problem?
什么时候负债才是一个问题?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
债务可以帮助企业发展,直到企业通过新的资本或自由现金流支付这笔债务。在最坏的情况下,如果一家公司无法偿还其债权人,那么该公司可能会破产。然而,更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,一家公司必须以低廉的股票价格稀释股东,才能控制债务。当然,债务可以成为企业的重要工具,尤其是对于资本密集的企业。考虑公司的债务水平的第一步是将现金和债务一起考虑。
How Much Debt Does Arrow Electronics Carry?
Arrow Electronics承载了多少债务?
As you can see below, Arrow Electronics had US$3.84b of debt at June 2024, down from US$4.16b a year prior. On the flip side, it has US$213.0m in cash leading to net debt of about US$3.62b.
正如下面所示,Arrow Electronics在2024年6月份有38.4亿美元的债务,低于前一年的41.6亿美元。而另一方面,它有2,1300万美元的现金,导致净债务约为36.2亿美元。
A Look At Arrow Electronics' Liabilities
看一下Arrow Electronics的负债情况。
According to the last reported balance sheet, Arrow Electronics had liabilities of US$11.3b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$2.98b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$213.0m in cash and US$10.9b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$3.19b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
根据最近公布的资产负债表,Arrow Electronics在12个月内有113亿美元的负债,超过12个月有29.8亿美元的负债。然而,它有2.13亿美元的现金和1.09亿美元的应收款项在12个月内到期。所以,其负债总额比其现金和短期应收款项的总和多出31.9亿美元。
This deficit isn't so bad because Arrow Electronics is worth US$6.58b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.
这个赤字并不太糟糕,因为Arrow Electronics的价值为65.8亿美元,如果有需要的话,可能筹集到足够的资本来稳固其资产负债表。然而,仍然值得密切关注其偿债能力。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我们通过查看净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比以及计算其利息支出由收益前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖的程度来度量一家公司的债务负载相对于其收益能力的程度。此方法的优点在于我们同时考虑了债务的绝对量(以净债务为EBITDA)以及与该债务相关的实际利息支出(以其利息覆盖倍数计算)。
Arrow Electronics has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.6 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 4.7 times. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Shareholders should be aware that Arrow Electronics's EBIT was down 32% last year. If that earnings trend continues then paying off its debt will be about as easy as herding cats on to a roller coaster. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Arrow Electronics's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
Arrow Electronics的债务与息税前利润折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)比率为2.6,其EBIT覆盖了利息费用的4.7倍。这表明尽管债务水平相当高,但我们不会过于担心。股东应该注意到,Arrow Electronics去年的EBIT下降了32%。如果这种盈利趋势持续下去,那么偿还债务将会像把猫赶上过山车那样困难。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中最多了解债务情况。但是,与任何东西相比,未来的盈利才是决定Arrow Electronics能否保持健康资产负债表的关键。所以,如果你关注未来,你可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师的利润预测。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. In the last three years, Arrow Electronics's free cash flow amounted to 26% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最后,虽然税务部门可能崇拜会计利润,但贷款人只接受冰冷的现金。所以值得检查多少EBIT受到自由现金流的支持。在过去三年中,Arrow Electronics的自由现金流占其EBIT的26%,低于我们的预期。这种疲软的现金转化使处理负债更加困难。
Our View
我们的观点
Mulling over Arrow Electronics's attempt at (not) growing its EBIT, we're certainly not enthusiastic. But at least its interest cover is not so bad. Looking at the bigger picture, it seems clear to us that Arrow Electronics's use of debt is creating risks for the company. If everything goes well that may pay off but the downside of this debt is a greater risk of permanent losses. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Arrow Electronics is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
考虑到Arrow Electronics在EBIt的增长(或者没有增长),我们并不乐观。但至少它的利息保障倍数还不错。从大局来看,对于Arrow Electronics来说,它的债务使用正为该公司带来风险。如果一切顺利,这可能会得到回报,但债务的下行风险是更大的永久损失风险。毋庸置疑,我们从资产负债表中了解到的是最多的债务信息。但最终,每个公司都可能存在资产负债表之外的风险。请注意,根据我们的投资分析,Arrow Electronics显示了3个警示信号,您应该了解...。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
说到底,有时候更容易集中精力关注根本不需要债务的公司。读者可以免费访问零净债务增长股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。