share_log

An Excellent Week for Redwood Trust, Inc.'s (NYSE:RWT) Institutional Owners Who Own 82% as One-year Returns Inch Higher

An Excellent Week for Redwood Trust, Inc.'s (NYSE:RWT) Institutional Owners Who Own 82% as One-year Returns Inch Higher

红木信托公司(NYSE:RWT)的机构投资者在过去一年的回报率略有提高,82%的股份归他们所有,这是一个出色的周。
Simply Wall St ·  09/13 06:06

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Redwood Trust implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 纽交所的机构持有大量红杉信托的股份意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响力。
  • 前八大股东持有该业务的51%。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。

If you want to know who really controls Redwood Trust, Inc. (NYSE:RWT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁实际控制着红杉信托公司(纽交所股票代码:RWT),那么你需要看一下公司股东名册的构成。机构持有82%的股份,是公司最大的股东。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 5.8% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 9.9%.

作为结果,上周该公司股价上涨了5.8%,机构投资者获得了最多的回报。 上周的收益将进一步提高股东的一年回报率,目前为9.9%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Redwood Trust.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于Redwood Trust的什么。

big
NYSE:RWT Ownership Breakdown September 13th 2024
NYSE:RWt 所有权拆分于2024年9月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Redwood Trust?

机构持股告诉我们什么关于红木信托?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that Redwood Trust does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Redwood Trust's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到Redwood Trust确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的一部分股票。 这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。 但是,不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会犯错误的投资,就像每个人都会犯错误一样。 如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看Redwood Trust的下面的盈利历史。 当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:RWT Earnings and Revenue Growth September 13th 2024
纽交所:RWt收益和营业收入增长2024年9月13日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Redwood Trust. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 10% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Wellington Management Group LLP are the second and third largest shareholders.

投资者应该注意到,机构实际上拥有该公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以共同发挥重要作用。我们注意到,对于Redwood Trust,对冲基金没有意义的投资。BlackRock公司目前是该公司最大的股东,持有17%的流通股。The Vanguard Group和Wellington Management Group LLP分别持有11%和10%的流通股,是第二大和第三大股东。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步调查发现,超过一半的Bentley Systems股份归前8位股东所有,这表明大股东和小股东的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Redwood Trust

红木信托的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Redwood Trust, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$978m, and insiders have US$12m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

股东可能会有兴趣了解,红木信托公司的内部人士持有股份。市值仅为97800万美元,内部人士以自己的名字持有1200万美元的股份。看到内部人士进行了一些投资是好事,但值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在购买。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Redwood Trust. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众,通常是个体投资者,持有红木信托公司17%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响他们对公司政策的决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Redwood Trust (3 are a bit unpleasant) that you should be aware of.

尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经确定了红木信托公司的 4 个警示信号(其中 3 个有点不太愉快),您应该注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发