With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:LECO) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:LECO) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Lincoln Electric Holdings' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 19 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 考虑到机构在股票中占据的大股份,Lincoln Electric Holdings的股价可能受到他们交易决策的影响
- 前19名股东拥有该公司51%的股份。
- 最近由内部人士出售。
A look at the shareholders of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:LECO) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 81% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LECO)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。 持有最大股份的群体是机构,占据81%的所有权。 换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由于机构业主拥有巨额资源和流动性资产,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,尤其是对个人投资者。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于一家公司通常被视为一种理想的特征。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lincoln Electric Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解林肯电气控股的每一种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lincoln Electric Holdings?
机构持股对林肯电气控股公司有什么影响?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lincoln Electric Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lincoln Electric Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所见,机构投资者在林肯电气控股中持有相当大的股份。这表明专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人都会做一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图卖出某只股票,那么股价大幅下跌也就不足为奇了。因此,值得检查林肯电气控股的过去盈利轨迹(下方)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lincoln Electric Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 10.0%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.8% by the third-largest shareholder.
由于机构投资者持有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能不得不关注他们的偏好。我们注意到对于Lincoln Electric Holdings而言,对冲基金没有意义的投资。该公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,持有10%的股份。作为背景,第二大股东持有约9.2%的流通股份,第三大股东持有4.8%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 19 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
观察股东登记表,我们可以看到51%的所有权由前19位股东控制,这意味着没有单一的股东掌握了多数股权所有权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of Lincoln Electric Holdings
林肯电气控股公司的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$63m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据显示,内部持有人拥有Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.不到1%的股份。 由于公司规模庞大,我们不会指望内部持有人拥有很大比例的股票。总体来看,他们共拥有6300万美元的股票。 最近买卖股票同样重要,您可以单击此处查看内部持有人是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in Lincoln Electric Holdings. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,通常指个人投资者,持有Lincoln Electric Holdings 18%的股份。 尽管这个群体不一定能左右公司的决策,但肯定会对公司的经营产生真正影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Lincoln Electric Holdings has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
虽然考虑到拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,风险是一个例子-林肯电气控股有1个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。