share_log

Following a 2.6% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE:APD) Institutional Owners

Following a 2.6% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE:APD) Institutional Owners

在去年下降了2.6%之后,最近的收益可能会让Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (纽交所代码:APD)的机构投资者感到满意
Simply Wall St ·  09/16 08:25

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Air Products and Chemicals' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 机构占有量显著高的意味着空气化工的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感
  • 前16名股东持有该业务50%的股份。
  • 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。

Every investor in Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE:APD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 89% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

空气化工公司(NYSE:APD)的每位投资者都应意识到最强大的股东群体。机构持有89%的股份,是公司中持有股份最多的群体。换句话说,这个群体对他们投资公司有可能获得(或损失)最多。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 3.8% increase in the share price after a year of 2.6% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

在经历了2.6%的亏损一年后,机构投资者可能会对上周股价上涨3.8%表示欢迎,这可能是回报率开始上升的迹象。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Air Products and Chemicals.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了Air Products and Chemicals的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:APD Ownership Breakdown September 16th 2024
NYSE:APD 所有权分布 2024年9月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Air Products and Chemicals?

机构投资者对Air Products and Chemicals有什么看法呢?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Air Products and Chemicals already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Air Products and Chemicals' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Air Products and Chemicals已拥有机构投资者的股权登记册。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当大的股份,这表明在专业投资者中享有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总会存在它们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多个方面可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到Air Products和Chemicals的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总会更加复杂。

big
NYSE:APD Earnings and Revenue Growth September 16th 2024
纽交所:APD盈利和营业收入增长2024年9月16日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Air Products and Chemicals. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.5% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.5% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 6.7% of the company stock.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。对空气化工公司,对冲基金持有的股份不多。目前,先锋集团是最大的股东,持有公司已发行股份的9.5%。黑石集团是第二大股东,拥有普通股的7.5%,而Capital Research and Management Company持有公司股份的约6.7%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

通过股东登记簿我们可以看到,16个最大的股东控制着50%的所有权,这意味着没有一个股东拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of Air Products and Chemicals

空气化工公司的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$229m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

根据我们最新的数据显示,内部人士仅拥有Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.少于1%的股份。由于该公司规模如此之大,我们不会预计内部人士拥有大量股票。总体而言,他们共拥有22900万美元的股票。在这种情况下,更有意思的是看看这些内部人士是否一直在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Air Products and Chemicals. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公众(通常是个人投资者)持有Air Products and Chemicals 11%的股份。虽然这个群体可能不能决定事情,但肯定能对公司的运行产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Air Products and Chemicals .

尽管了解拥有公司的不同群体是很值得考虑的,但还有其他更重要的因素。为此,您应该注意我们发现的Air Products and Chemicals存在的2个警告信号。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发