Sapiens International Corporation N.V.'s (NASDAQ:SPNS) Largest Shareholders Are Public Companies With 44% Ownership, Institutions Own 40%
Sapiens International Corporation N.V.'s (NASDAQ:SPNS) Largest Shareholders Are Public Companies With 44% Ownership, Institutions Own 40%
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by public companies in Sapiens International indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 3 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Institutions own 40% of Sapiens International
- 纳斯达克公司参股sapiens international的大比例股权表明,它们共同对管理和商业策略有更大发言权。
- 前三大股东拥有公司51%的股份。
- 机构拥有sapiens international的40%股份。
A look at the shareholders of Sapiens International Corporation N.V. (NASDAQ:SPNS) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 44% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看sapiens international股份有限公司(纳斯达克:SPNS)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最有影响力。 公司拥有44%的股权,公众公司拥有该公司的最大股份。 换句话说,该集团面临的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)最大。
Meanwhile, institutions make up 40% of the company's shareholders. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones.
同时,机构占了公司股东的40%。 机构通常会持有大公司的股票,而我们预计会看到内部人员占小公司的可观比例。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Sapiens International.
让我们仔细研究一下不同类型的股东对Sapiens International的影响。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sapiens International?
机构所有权对Sapiens International有何影响?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
Sapiens International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Sapiens International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Sapiens International已经在股东注册表上有机构。事实上,他们在公司拥有相当大的股份。 这表明在专业投资者中还具有一定的可信度。 但是,我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会犯错误投资,就像每个人一样。 当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总会存在他们参与的'人满为患的交易'的风险。 当这种交易出现问题时,多个交易方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。 在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。 您可以查看Sapiens International的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事一直没有完全结束。
Sapiens International is not owned by hedge funds. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 44% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.7% and 2.9% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Roni Al-Dor directly holds 1.6% of the total shares outstanding.
Sapiens International不是由对冲基金持有。Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.目前是最大的股东,持有44%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有大约4.7%和2.9%的股份。此外,该公司的CEO Roni Al-Dor直接持有总流通股的1.6%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
总的来说,包括散户投资者在内,公众拥有公司的14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Sapiens International
Sapiens International的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in Sapiens International Corporation N.V.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$31m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们可以看到Sapiens International Corporation N.V.的内部持有股份。这是一家大公司,所以看到这种程度的一致性是好事。内部人持有价值3100万美元的股份(按照当前价格计算)。大多数人会说这显示了股东和董事会的利益一致性。不过,还是值得检查一下这些内部人是否一直在卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Sapiens International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大众,通常是个人投资者,在Sapiens International拥有15%的股份。尽管这个群体不能决定一切,但它肯定对公司的运营产生了真正的影响。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
Public companies currently own 44% of Sapiens International stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
目前,公开公司拥有sapiens international股票的44%。我们不能确定,但很可能这是一个战略性的股份。这些企业可能相似,或者进行合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Sapiens International better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Sapiens International is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
值得考虑的是,不同的群体拥有公司的股份。但要更好地了解sapiens international,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,在我们的投资分析中,sapiens international出现了一个警示标志,你应该知道...
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。