share_log

SJW Group (NYSE:SJW) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 78% of the Company

SJW Group (NYSE:SJW) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 78% of the Company

sjw group(纽交所:SJW)主要由机构股东控制,占公司78%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  09/17 06:41

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in SJW Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构在sjw group的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响力
  • 该公司共有8个股东拥有51%的股权。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of SJW Group (NYSE:SJW) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 78% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看sjw group(纽交所:sjw)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权势。最大股份是由机构持有的,占据了78%。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因为机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往带有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者来说。因此,机构投资在一家公司中的大量资金通常被视为一个积极因素。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SJW Group.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关SJW Group的什么信息。

big
NYSE:SJW Ownership Breakdown September 17th 2024
纽交所:SJW 所有权分布 2024年9月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SJW Group?

机构持股告诉我们有关SJW Group的什么信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

SJW Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of SJW Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

SJW Group在股东名册上已经有机构。事实上,他们在公司中占有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这支股票,并且他们对其看好。但和其他任何人一样,他们也可能错。如果两位大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,大股价下跌并不罕见。因此值得检查SJW Group的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:SJW Earnings and Revenue Growth September 17th 2024
纽交所:sjw集团2024年9月17日营收和收入增长

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in SJW Group. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.5% and 6.5% of the stock.

机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能能够对董事会的决策产生强大影响。我们注意到对冲基金对sjw集团没有具体投资。 BlackRock, Inc.目前是最大的股东,持有17%的流通股。 相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有该股票的约7.5%和6.5%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步调查发现,超过一半的Bentley Systems股份归前8位股东所有,这表明大股东和小股东的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of SJW Group

sjw集团内部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in SJW Group. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$169m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最近的数据表明,在SJW Group,内部持有一些股份。这是一家大公司,因此看到这种程度的一致性是件好事。内部人士持有价值16900万美元的股份(按照当前价格计算)。大多数人会说,这显示了股东和董事会之间的利益一致。尽管如此,值得注意的是,也许值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在抛售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

我认为查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但是为了获得真正的见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,风险 - Cadence银行有3个需要引起我们关注的警告信号。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand SJW Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - SJW Group has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

始终值得考虑一家公司的不同股东群体。但要更好地了解sjw group,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。以风险为例- sjw group有3个警告标志(还有1个不能被忽视的),我们认为您应该了解。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发