With 82% Institutional Ownership, Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPC) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 82% Institutional Ownership, Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPC) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Genuine Parts' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 24 shareholders
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 机构持有股权的比例很高意味着Genuine Parts的股票价格对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
- 最高的24位股东持有公司50%的股份。
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
为了了解谁真正掌控着Genuine Parts Company (NYSE:GPC),了解该公司的股权结构非常重要。我们可以看到机构拥有该公司82%的股权。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由于机构股东拥有巨大的资源池和流动资金,他们的投资决策往往承载着很大的权重,特别是对个人投资者来说。因此,机构投入该公司的资金通常是对其未来的极大信心。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Genuine Parts.
让我们仔细研究一下,看看不同类型的股东对 Genuine Parts 公司有什么信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Genuine Parts?
机构持有权告诉我们关于 Genuine Parts 的一些信息
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Genuine Parts does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Genuine Parts, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到 Genuine Parts 公司确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资社区有一定的信誉度。然而,我们最好不要完全依赖于机构投资者所提供的所谓认可。他们也有时会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时尝试抛售一只股票,股价暴跌是常见的情况。因此,值得检查 Genuine Parts 的过去收入轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Genuine Parts. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.8% and 5.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
投资者应注意,机构实际持有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以集体行使重要的权力。我们注意到,对于Genuine Parts,对冲基金并没有重大投资。该公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有12%的股权。同时第二和第三大股东分别持有7.8%和5.3%的流通股。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 24 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东注册表可以看出,24位最高股东控制了50%的拥有权,这意味着没有单一股东拥有拥有权的绝大部分。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Genuine Parts
Genuine Parts的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Genuine Parts Company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$71m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据显示,内部人士拥有Genuine Parts Company不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,所以看到内部人士拥有公司较大比例的股份是令人惊讶的。虽然他们持有的股份不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共计拥有价值7100万美元的股份(按当前股价计算)。在这种情况下,更有趣的是看内部人士是否一直在买入或卖出股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众(包括零售投资者)拥有公司17%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然这种拥有量相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Genuine Parts you should be aware of.
我发现看看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但是要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。典型案例:我们发现 Genuine Parts 存在 1 个警示信号,你应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。