Returns At B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) Appear To Be Weighed Down
Returns At B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) Appear To Be Weighed Down
If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? One common approach is to try and find a company with returns on capital employed (ROCE) that are increasing, in conjunction with a growing amount of capital employed. Ultimately, this demonstrates that it's a business that is reinvesting profits at increasing rates of return. However, after briefly looking over the numbers, we don't think B&G Foods (NYSE:BGS) has the makings of a multi-bagger going forward, but let's have a look at why that may be.
如果我们想要找到一只股票,可以在长期内成倍增长,我们应该寻找哪些潜在趋势?一个常见的方法是尝试寻找一家ROCE(资本使用回报率)正在增长的公司,同时资本使用量也在增加。最终,这表明这是一家正在以越来越高的投资回报率再投资利润的企业。然而,在简要查看了一下数据之后,我们认为B&G食品(纽交所:BGS)未来不太可能成为多袋赚钱机会,但让我们来看看为什么。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
我们对 Enphase Energy 的资本雇用回报率的看法:正如我们上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的资本回报率没有提高,但它正在重新投资于业务。投资者必须认为未来会有更好的前景,因为股票表现良好,使持股五年以上的股东获得了 690% 的收益。最终,如果基本趋势持续存在,我们不会对它成为一只多头股持有期很久很有信心。
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for B&G Foods, this is the formula:
如果您以前没有接触过ROCE,它衡量了公司从其业务中使用的资本所产生的“回报”(税前利润)。 要为B&G食品计算这一指标,使用以下公式:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资产雇用回报率(ROCE)是指企业利润,即企业税前利润除以企业投入的总资本(负债加股权)。如果ROCE高于企业财务成本的承受能力,那么企业就会创造出更多的价值。
0.08 = US$230m ÷ (US$3.4b - US$490m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
0.08 = 2.3亿美元 ÷(340亿美元 - 4.9亿美元)(基于截至2024年6月的过去十二个月)。
Therefore, B&G Foods has an ROCE of 8.0%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Food industry average of 11%.
因此,B&G食品的ROCE为8.0%。 最终,这是一个较低的回报率,低于食品行业平均水平11%。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for B&G Foods compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for B&G Foods .
上面你可以看到B&G食品当前的ROCE与以前的资本回报相比如何,但是从过去的数据中你只能得到有限的信息。如果您有兴趣,您可以查看我们免费的B&G食品分析师报告中的分析师预测。
So How Is B&G Foods' ROCE Trending?
那么B&G食品的ROCE趋势如何?
There hasn't been much to report for B&G Foods' returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. This tells us the company isn't reinvesting in itself, so it's plausible that it's past the growth phase. So don't be surprised if B&G Foods doesn't end up being a multi-bagger in a few years time. That probably explains why B&G Foods has been paying out 86% of its earnings as dividends to shareholders. If the company is in fact lacking growth opportunities, that's one of the viable alternatives for the money.
过去五年来,B&G食品的回报和资本使用水平都保持稳定,因此没有太多可报告的。这告诉我们公司并没有重新投资自身,因此很可能已经过了增长阶段。所以如果在几年后B&G食品没有表现出成倍增长,也就不足为奇了。这也解释了为什么B&G食品将其利润的86%作为股息分配给股东。如果公司真的缺乏增长机会,那就是资金的可行替代方案之一。
Our Take On B&G Foods' ROCE
我们对B&G食品的ROCE的看法
In a nutshell, B&G Foods has been trudging along with the same returns from the same amount of capital over the last five years. Since the stock has declined 33% over the last five years, investors may not be too optimistic on this trend improving either. All in all, the inherent trends aren't typical of multi-baggers, so if that's what you're after, we think you might have more luck elsewhere.
简而言之,过去五年来,B&G食品的资本回报率与资本投入量保持不变。由于过去五年中股票下跌了33%,投资者对这一趋势的改善可能并不太乐观。总的来说,这些固有趋势并不典型于成倍增长的股票,所以如果你追求这方面的投资,我们认为你可能在其他地方更有运气。
Since virtually every company faces some risks, it's worth knowing what they are, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for B&G Foods (of which 1 is a bit concerning!) that you should know about.
因为几乎每家公司都面临一些风险,所以了解这些风险是很有价值的。我们发现B&G食品有3个预警信号(其中1个有点令人担忧!)你应该了解。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想寻找财务状况良好、回报卓越的实力强企业,可以免费查看以下公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。