share_log

With 42% Ownership in Root, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROOT), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 42% Ownership in Root, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROOT), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

在Root,Inc.(纳斯达克: ROOT)拥有42%的股权,机构投资者对该业务有很大的利益。
Simply Wall St ·  09/18 07:21

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Root's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • 21% of Root is held by insiders
  • 鉴于机构在股票中持有大量股份,Root的股价可能会受到它们交易决策的影响
  • 前八大股东持有该业务的51%。
  • 公司21%的股份由内部持有者持有。

Every investor in Root, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROOT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Root股票的每位投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东团体。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司42%的股权,换句话说,该团体面临的上涨潜力(或下行风险)最大。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$77m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 289%.

上周,该公司的市值增加了7700万美元,这对机构投资者来说是个好消息。上周的收益将进一步提升股东的一年回报率,目前为289%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Root, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入研究一下Root的每一类所有者,从下面的图表开始。

big
NasdaqGS:ROOT Ownership Breakdown September 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:ROOt所有权分布于2024年9月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Root?

机构所有权对Root有什么影响?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

We can see that Root does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Root, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到Root确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司股票的一部分。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。但仅凭这个事实我们不能完全依赖,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查Root的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NasdaqGS:ROOT Earnings and Revenue Growth September 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:ROOt 2024年9月18日盈利和营收增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Root. The company's largest shareholder is Ribbit Management Company, LLC, with ownership of 13%. With 9.6% and 7.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Christopher Olsen and Alexander Timm are the second and third largest shareholders. Alexander Timm, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

我们注意到对于Root而言,对冲基金并没有意义的投资。该公司最大的股东是Ribbit Management Company, LLC,持有13%的股权。 Christopher Olsen和Alexander Timm分别持有9.6%和7.5%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股东。 Alexander Timm是第三大股东,同时也担任董事会主席。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进一步了解,前8大股东持有该公司约51%的注册股份,这意味着除了更大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Root

Root的内部持有。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Root, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$603m, and insiders have US$125m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据显示,内部持有合理比例的Root, Inc.股份。其市值仅为60300万美元,内部人员名下持有价值12500万美元的股份。这可能意味着创始人仍然持有大量股份。您可以点击这里查看是否他们一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Root. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

拥有19%的股份,由个人投资者主导的普通公众在Root拥有一定影响力。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以左右政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With an ownership of 18%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股权投资公司拥有18%的股权,因此可以在塑造企业策略方面发挥作用,重点是价值创造。 一些投资者可能会因此而感到鼓舞,因为股权投资有时能够鼓励帮助市场看到公司价值的策略。另一方面,这些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Root has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。比如说风险 - Root有3个警示标志,我们认为你应该注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发