share_log

Andersons (NASDAQ:ANDE) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Andersons (NASDAQ:ANDE) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

安德森斯(纳斯达克:ANDE)似乎相当明智地运用债务。
Simply Wall St ·  09/18 08:02

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, The Andersons, Inc. (NASDAQ:ANDE) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

大卫·伊本说得好:“我们关心的不是波动性是不是风险。我们关心的是避免资本永久损失。”当你评估一家企业的风险时,自然要考虑其资产负债表,因为企业倒闭常常涉及债务。重要的是,The Andersons, Inc. (纳斯达克代码:ANDE)确实有债务。但这些债务对股东而言是否是个问题呢?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

为什么债务会带来风险?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

债务是帮助企业增长的一种工具,但如果企业无法偿还其债权人,则存在于其债权人的掌控中。资本主义的一部分是“创造性破坏”过程,即失败的企业会被无情地清算。然而,更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,公司必须以低廉的股价稀释股东权益,以控制债务。然而,通过取代股权稀释,债务可以成为需要资本以高回报率投资增长的企业的极好工具。当我们思考一个公司对债务的使用时,我们首先看现金和债务的总体情况。

How Much Debt Does Andersons Carry?

安德森斯负债多少?

As you can see below, Andersons had US$581.1m of debt at June 2024, down from US$706.8m a year prior. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$540.3m, its net debt is less, at about US$40.7m.

如下图所示,安德森斯在2024年6月的债务为58110万美元,较一年前的70680万美元下降。然而,由于其现金储备为54030万美元,其净债务较小,约为4070万美元。

big
NasdaqGS:ANDE Debt to Equity History September 18th 2024
纳斯达克代码:ANDE的资产负债比历史数据于2024年9月18日

How Strong Is Andersons' Balance Sheet?

安德森斯的资产负债表有多强?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Andersons had liabilities of US$1.08b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$694.8m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$540.3m in cash and US$743.6m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$495.7m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

详细查看最新的资产负债表数据,我们可以看到安德森斯有108亿美元的负债在12个月内到期,以及69480万美元的负债超出12个月。与此相抵,它有54030万美元的现金和74360万美元应在12个月内到期的应收账款。因此,它的负债总额比其现金和短期应收款项的组合多49570万美元。

This deficit isn't so bad because Andersons is worth US$1.63b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

这种赤字并不严重,因为安德森斯价值163亿美元,因此如果需要的话,可能会筹集足够的资金来支撑其资产负债表。但很明显,我们绝对应该仔细审查它是否能够管理债务而不会稀释。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

为了比较一个公司的债务与其收益的关系,我们计算其净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆盖率)。因此,我们考虑了债务的绝对数量以及支付的利率。

Andersons has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.13. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 16.4 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. But the bad news is that Andersons has seen its EBIT plunge 19% in the last twelve months. If that rate of decline in earnings continues, the company could find itself in a tight spot. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Andersons can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

安德森斯的净负债与EBITDA比率仅为0.13。其EBIt覆盖其利息费用的倍数高达16.4倍。因此,你可以说它对待债务的态度就像大象对待老鼠那样毫不担忧。但坏消息是,安德森斯在过去12个月内看到其EBIt下降了19%。如果这种盈利下降速度持续下去,公司可能会陷入困境。资产负债表显然是分析债务时需要专注的领域。但最终,业务未来的盈利能力将决定安德森斯是否能够随着时间强化其资产负债表。因此,如果你想知道专业人士的看法,你可能会发现这份有关分析师盈利预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Happily for any shareholders, Andersons actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT over the last three years. That sort of strong cash generation warms our hearts like a puppy in a bumblebee suit.

最后,虽然税务人员可能欣赏会计利润,但放贷人只接受冰冷的现金。因此逻辑性的步骤是查看与实际自由现金流匹配的EBIt比例。让任何股东欣慰的是,安德森斯过去三年的自由现金流比EBIt还要多。这种强劲的现金产生令我们如同看到穿着蜜蜂服的小狗一样心潮澎湃。

Our View

我们的观点

Andersons's interest cover suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. But the stark truth is that we are concerned by its EBIT growth rate. Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that Andersons can handle its debt fairly comfortably. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. We'd be motivated to research the stock further if we found out that Andersons insiders have bought shares recently. If you would too, then you're in luck, since today we're sharing our list of reported insider transactions for free.

安德森斯的利息覆盖表明它可以像克里斯蒂亚诺·罗纳尔多(Cristiano Ronaldo)对待一个14岁以下的门将一样轻松地处理其债务。但冰冷的事实是,我们对它的EBIT增长率感到担忧。综合考虑所有上述因素,我们认为安德森斯可以相当舒适地处理其债务。当然,尽管这种杠杆可以提高股权回报率,但也带来更多风险,所以最好密切关注。如果我们发现安德森斯内部人士最近购买了股票,我们将有动力进一步研究该股票。如果您也愿意这样做,那么您很幸运,因为今天我们将免费分享我们报告的内部交易列表。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果在所有这些之后,您更感兴趣的是具有坚实资产负债表的快速增长公司,那么不要拖延,查看我们的净现金增长股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发