Private Equity Firms Who Hold 54% of Corsair Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRSR) Gained 15%, Institutions Profited as Well
Private Equity Firms Who Hold 54% of Corsair Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRSR) Gained 15%, Institutions Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Corsair Gaming by private equity firms implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The largest shareholder of the company is EagleTree Capital, LP with a 54% stake
- Institutional ownership in Corsair Gaming is 29%
- 私募股权公司对Corsair Gaming的重要掌控权意味着普通公众在管理和治理决策上拥有更大的影响力。
- 该公司的最大股东是EagleTree Capital, LP,持有54%的股份
- Corsair Gaming的机构持股比例为29%
If you want to know who really controls Corsair Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRSR), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private equity firms own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想了解谁真正控制Corsair Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRSR),那就得查看其股东登记册的构成。我们可以看到,私募股权投资公司拥有该公司54%的所有权。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最多(如果市场下跌,可能也会亏损最多)。
Following a 15% increase in the stock price last week, private equity firms profited the most, but institutions who own 29% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
上周股价上涨了15%,股权投资机构从中获利最多,但持有29%股票的机构也有望从涨价中获益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Corsair Gaming.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了Corsair Gaming的不同股权集团。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Corsair Gaming?
机构所有权告诉我们关于Corsair Gaming什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Corsair Gaming. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Corsair Gaming's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在Corsair Gaming拥有相当大的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,并且他们对它很看好。但是就像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总会存在着它们属于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个交易对手可能会竞相抛售股票。这种风险在一个没有增长历史的公司中更高。下面你可以看到Corsair Gaming的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更加复杂的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Corsair Gaming. EagleTree Capital, LP is currently the largest shareholder, with 54% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.3% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Andrew Paul is the owner of 2.6% of the company's shares.
对冲基金在corsair gaming中持有的股份不多。EagleTree Capital, LP目前是最大的股东,持有公司已发行股份的54%。这意味着他们对公司的未来具有绝对控制权。其次,第二大股东持有已发行股份的约6.7%,紧随其后的是第三大股东持有公司已发行股份的5.3%。此外,CEO Andrew Paul持有公司股份的2.6%。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Corsair Gaming
Corsair Gaming的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Corsair Gaming, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$22m worth of stock in the US$679m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最新的数据显示,Corsair Gaming, Inc.的内部人员拥有一些股份。在他们自己的名字下,内部人员在这家价值67900万美元的公司中拥有2200万美元的股票。这至少表明了一定的利益一致。您可以点击这里查看这些内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括零售投资者在内的普通公众拥有该公司13%的股份,因此不容易被忽视。尽管该公司拥有相当大的股权,但如果决策与其他大股东的决策不同步,这可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With an ownership of 54%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
拥有54%的股权,私募股权公司能够在塑造以价值创造为重点的企业战略方面发挥作用。有人可能会喜欢这一点,因为私募股权有时是激进分子,他们会追究管理层的责任。但有时,私募股权会出售股权,让公司上市。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Corsair Gaming better, we need to consider many other factors.
值得考虑的是拥有某公司股权的不同群体。但要更好地了解corsair gaming,我们还需要考虑许多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。