Institutional Investors of Avadel Pharmaceuticals Plc (NASDAQ:AVDL) Must Be Disappointed After Last Week's 3.9% Drop
Institutional Investors of Avadel Pharmaceuticals Plc (NASDAQ:AVDL) Must Be Disappointed After Last Week's 3.9% Drop
Key Insights
关键见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Avadel Pharmaceuticals' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,Avadel Pharmaceuticals的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
- 51% 的业务由前6名股东持有
- 使用分析师预测的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现
If you want to know who really controls Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (NASDAQ:AVDL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制着Avadel Pharmicals plc(纳斯达克股票代码:AVDL),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。机构拥有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。
And last week, institutional endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 3.9%.
上周,该股下跌了3.9%,该机构遭受了最大的跌幅。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Avadel Pharmaceuticals.
在下图中,我们放大了Avadel Pharmicals的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Avadel Pharmaceuticals?
关于Avadel 制药公司,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Avadel Pharmaceuticals. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Avadel Pharmaceuticals, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如你所见,机构投资者持有Avadel Pharmicals的相当数量的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Avadel Pharmicals过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 6.0% of Avadel Pharmaceuticals shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Our data shows that Janus Henderson Group plc is the largest shareholder with 25% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.0% by the third-largest shareholder.
机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。看来对冲基金拥有Avadel Pharmicals6.0%的股份。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层,或者带来能够为股东创造短期价值的变革。我们的数据显示,骏利亨德森集团是最大股东,已发行股份的25%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约6.8%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有6.0%的所有权。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前六名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Avadel Pharmaceuticals
Avadel Pharmicals 的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$10m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己的名义拥有Avadel Pharmicals plc不到1%的股份。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人士拥有价值1000万美元的股票。绝对值可能比比例份额更重要。看到至少有一部分内部所有权总是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Avadel Pharmaceuticals. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有Avadel Pharmicals10%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Avadel Pharmaceuticals better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Avadel Pharmaceuticals has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解Avadel Pharmicals,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。以风险为例——Avadel Pharmaceuticals有1个我们认为你应该注意的警告信号。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。