Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE:BNL) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE:BNL) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Broadstone Net Lease's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 鉴于机构对该股的大部分持股，Broadstone Net Lease的股价可能会受到他们的交易决策的影响。
- 一共有11个投资者拥有该公司50％的所有权。
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
A look at the shareholders of Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE:BNL) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
观察Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE:BNL)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有影响力。机构持有82%的股份，在该公司中持股最多。也就是说，该群体在股票上涨时最有利可图（或在经济下滑时最亏损）。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由于机构拥有大量的资金和研究能力，因此机构所有权往往具有相当的分量，特别是对于个人投资者。因此，机构在一家企业中投资的规模可视为该企业的一项重要资产。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Broadstone Net Lease.
让我们仔细看看股东的不同类型能告诉我们有关Broadstone Net Lease的什么信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Broadstone Net Lease?
机构所有权对Broadstone Net Lease有什么影响？
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此，他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Broadstone Net Lease already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Broadstone Net Lease, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Broadstone Net Lease已经有机构出现在股东名册上。实际上，他们在该公司拥有一定比例的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这支股票，而且他们挺喜欢。但就像其他任何人一样，他们也有可能出错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票，股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此，值得检查Broadstone Net Lease的过去收益轨迹（如下）。当然，也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Broadstone Net Lease. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 7.8% of the stock.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票，董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。Hedge funds在Broadstone Net Lease中没有太多股份。目前，Vanguard Group, Inc.是该公司最大的股东，拥有15%的流通股。相比之下，第二和第三大股东持有大约10%和7.8%的股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
在深入挖掘后，我们发现前11名股东在该公司拥有50%的股份，这意味着没有单一的股东对公司拥有显著的控制权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪，也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票，看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Broadstone Net Lease
Broadstone Net Lease的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的，并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员，至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而，经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见，尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的，因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是，在某些场合下，这个团体的权力过于集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$51m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们可以报告广泛的净租赁股权公司内部人员拥有股份。它是一家相当大的公司，所以能够看到一些可能具有重大意义的利益一致是很积极的。在这种情况下，他们在（当前价格下）拥有价值约5100万美元的股份。看到内部人员的这种投资水平是好的。您可以在这里查看内部人员最近是否一直在购买。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Broadstone Net Lease. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通投资者通常持有广泛净租赁16%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能左右决策，但它对公司运营肯定会产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步：
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Broadstone Net Lease (including 2 which are a bit unpleasant) .
我发现查看公司的实际所有人非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力，我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此，您应该了解关于Broadstone Net Lease的3个警告信号（其中2个有点不愉快）。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终，未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注：本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈？对内容有任何疑虑？请直接与我们联系。或者，发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论，只使用公正的方法论，我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议，也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意，我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。