share_log

Lear (NYSE:LEA) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital

Lear (NYSE:LEA) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital

李尔(纽交所:LEA)可能存在资本分配问题
Simply Wall St ·  09/19 12:23

Ignoring the stock price of a company, what are the underlying trends that tell us a business is past the growth phase? A business that's potentially in decline often shows two trends, a return on capital employed (ROCE) that's declining, and a base of capital employed that's also declining. Trends like this ultimately mean the business is reducing its investments and also earning less on what it has invested. So after glancing at the trends within Lear (NYSE:LEA), we weren't too hopeful.

忽略公司的股价,有哪些潜在趋势告诉我们一个企业已经经过了成长阶段?一个潜在处于衰退状态的企业通常会表现出两种趋势,即资本使用效率(ROCE)下降,以及使用资本的基础也在下降。这样的趋势最终意味着企业在减少投资,并且对其投资所获得的回报也在减少。因此,初步了解了李尔(纽交所:LEA)内部趋势后,我们的希望并不是太高。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

我们对 Enphase Energy 的资本雇用回报率的看法:正如我们上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的资本回报率没有提高,但它正在重新投资于业务。投资者必须认为未来会有更好的前景,因为股票表现良好,使持股五年以上的股东获得了 690% 的收益。最终,如果基本趋势持续存在,我们不会对它成为一只多头股持有期很久很有信心。

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on Lear is:

对于不了解的人来说,ROCE是衡量公司年度税前利润(其回报),相对于企业使用的资本的一种度量。在李尔的计算公式为:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

资产雇用回报率(ROCE)是指企业利润,即企业税前利润除以企业投入的总资本(负债加股权)。如果ROCE高于企业财务成本的承受能力,那么企业就会创造出更多的价值。

0.12 = US$1.0b ÷ (US$15b - US$5.8b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

0.12 = 100亿美元 ÷(150亿美元 - 5.8亿美元)(基于截至2024年6月的最近十二个月)。

Thus, Lear has an ROCE of 12%. That's a relatively normal return on capital, and it's around the 11% generated by the Auto Components industry.

因此,李尔的ROCE为12%。这是一个相对正常的资本回报率,大约与汽车元件行业所产生的11%相当。

big
NYSE:LEA Return on Capital Employed September 19th 2024
纽交所:LEA资本使用效率回报2024年9月19日

Above you can see how the current ROCE for Lear compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for Lear .

在上面,您可以看到李尔当前的资本回报率与其先前的资本回报率相比,但过去只能得出有限的结论。如果您有兴趣,您可以在我们的免费分析师报告中查看分析师的预测。

So How Is Lear's ROCE Trending?

那么Lear的ROCE趋势如何?

There is reason to be cautious about Lear, given the returns are trending downwards. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 18% that they were earning five years ago. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Lear becoming one if things continue as they have.

对于李尔,存在谨慎的理由,因为回报率呈下降趋势。不幸的是,资本回报率已经从五年前的18%下降。除此之外,值得注意的是企业所投入的资本量保持相对稳定。这种组合可能表明成熟的企业仍有利用资本的领域,但由于可能存在新竞争或较小的利润率,所获得的回报并不高。因此,由于这些趋势通常不利于创造多倍投资收益,如果情况继续下去,我们不会对李尔成为这种股票抱太大希望。

The Bottom Line

还有一件事需要注意的是,我们已经确定了上海医药的2个警告信号,了解这些信号应该成为你的投资过程的一部分。

In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. And long term shareholders have watched their investments stay flat over the last five years. Unless there is a shift to a more positive trajectory in these metrics, we would look elsewhere.

最终,相同资本的回报率下降的趋势通常不是我们正在寻找的成长股的迹象。长期股东在过去五年里眼睁睁见证他们的投资停滞不前。除非这些指标转向更积极的轨迹,否则我们会寻找其他地方。

On a separate note, we've found 1 warning sign for Lear you'll probably want to know about.

另外,我们发现了李尔的1个警示信号,您可能会想知道。

If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.

如果您想寻找财务状况良好、回报卓越的实力强企业,可以免费查看以下公司列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发