The Three-year Loss for Quaker Chemical (NYSE:KWR) Shareholders Likely Driven by Its Shrinking Earnings
The Three-year Loss for Quaker Chemical (NYSE:KWR) Shareholders Likely Driven by Its Shrinking Earnings
Many investors define successful investing as beating the market average over the long term. But if you try your hand at stock picking, you risk returning less than the market. We regret to report that long term Quaker Chemical Corporation (NYSE:KWR) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 31% in three years, versus a market return of about 20%.
很多投资者认为,成功的投资是指长期超越市场平均水平。但是,如果你试图挑选个股,你可能会面临低于市场的风险。我们很遗憾地告诉大家,长期以来,Quaker Chemical Corporation (NYSE: KWR)的股东们已经有了这样的经历,股价在三年内下跌了31%,而市场回报率约为20%。
While the stock has risen 5.0% in the past week but long term shareholders are still in the red, let's see what the fundamentals can tell us.
虽然该股票在过去一周上涨了5.0%,但长期股东仍然亏损,让我们看看基本面能告诉我们什么。
In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.
沃伦·巴菲特在他的文章《格雷厄姆与多德维尔的超级投资者》中描述了股票价格并不总是合理地反映了一家企业的价值。考虑市场对一家公司的看法如何转变的一种不完美但简单的方法,是将每股收益(EPS)的变化与股价的动态进行比较。
Quaker Chemical saw its EPS decline at a compound rate of 6.0% per year, over the last three years. This reduction in EPS is slower than the 12% annual reduction in the share price. So it seems the market was too confident about the business, in the past.
在过去三年中,Quaker Chemical的每股收益以6.0%的复合年增长率下降。与之相比,股价的年减少率为12%。所以看起来市场对过去的业务过于自信了。
The company's earnings per share (over time) is depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).
该公司的每股收益(随时间的推移)如下图所示(单击可查看确切数字)。
We know that Quaker Chemical has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? This free report showing analyst revenue forecasts should help you figure out if the EPS growth can be sustained.
我们知道Quaker Chemical近来改善了其底线,但它是否能增加营业收入?这份显示分析师营业收入预测的免费报告应该有助于您判断EPS增长是否可持续。
What About Dividends?
那么分红怎么样呢?
As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of Quaker Chemical, it has a TSR of -29% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.
除了衡量股价回报,投资者还应考虑股东总回报(TSR)。TSR结合了任何剥离或打折融资的价值,以及任何分红,基于分红再投资的假设。可以说,TSR提供了对股票产生的回报的更全面的图片。在Quaker Chemical的情况下,过去3年的TSR为-29%。这超过了我们之前提到的股价回报。公司支付的股利因此提高了股东的总回报。
A Different Perspective
不同的观点
Quaker Chemical shareholders are up 7.7% for the year (even including dividends). Unfortunately this falls short of the market return. On the bright side, that's still a gain, and it's actually better than the average return of 3% over half a decade This suggests the company might be improving over time. Most investors take the time to check the data on insider transactions. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
Quaker Chemical股东今年的回报率为7.7%(包括股息)。不幸的是,这还不及市场回报。但好消息是,这仍然是一笔收益,而且实际上比过去半个十年的3%的平均回报更好。这表明公司可能随着时间推移而改善。大多数投资者会花时间检查内部交易数据。您可以在此处点击查看内部人是否一直在购买或出售。
We will like Quaker Chemical better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued stocks (mostly small caps) with considerable, recent, insider buying.
如果我们看到一些内部人员的大宗交易,我们会更喜欢喜力化工。在等待的时候,可以查看这份免费的低估股票名单(主要是小盘股),里面有相当多最近的内部人员买入。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
请注意,本文所引述的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。