share_log

Public Companies Account for 53% of Genting Singapore Limited's (SGX:G13) Ownership, While Individual Investors Account for 37%

Public Companies Account for 53% of Genting Singapore Limited's (SGX:G13) Ownership, While Individual Investors Account for 37%

公开公司占新加坡交易所(SGX:G13)53%的所有权,而个人投资者占37%
Simply Wall St ·  09/23 03:49

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant control over Genting Singapore by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 53% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Genting Berhad)
  • Institutions own 10% of Genting Singapore
  • 上市公司对新加坡云顶的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
  • 公司53%的股份由单一股东持有(云顶有限公司)
  • 机构拥有新加坡云顶10%的股份

If you want to know who really controls Genting Singapore Limited (SGX:G13), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 53% to be precise, is public companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着云顶新加坡有限公司(SGX: G13),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。持有该公司股份最多的集团是上市公司,准确地说约为53%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 37% of the company's stockholders.

另一方面,个人投资者占公司股东的37%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Genting Singapore.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于云顶新加坡的哪些信息。

big
SGX:G13 Ownership Breakdown September 23rd 2024
新加坡证券交易所:G13 所有权明细 2024 年 9 月 23 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Genting Singapore?

关于新加坡云顶,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Genting Singapore already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Genting Singapore's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

云顶新加坡已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看新加坡云顶的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
SGX:G13 Earnings and Revenue Growth September 23rd 2024
新加坡证券交易所:G13 收益和收入增长 2024 年 9 月 23 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Genting Singapore. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Genting Berhad with 53% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. With 1.9% and 1.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

对冲基金在新加坡云顶的股票不多。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是云顶有限公司,已发行股份的53%。这意味着他们对公司的未来拥有多数权益控制权。Vanguard Group, Inc.和贝莱德公司分别拥有1.9%和1.6%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Genting Singapore

新加坡云顶的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Genting Singapore Limited. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own S$42m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士拥有云顶新加坡有限公司不到1%的股份。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人士拥有价值4200万新元的股票。绝对值可能比比例份额更重要。很高兴看到董事会成员拥有股票,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 37% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司37%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

It appears to us that public companies own 53% of Genting Singapore. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

在我们看来,上市公司拥有云顶新加坡53%的股份。这可能是战略利益,两家公司可能有相关的商业利益。可能是他们已经沉没了。该持股可能值得进一步调查。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Genting Singapore better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Genting Singapore that you should be aware of.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解新加坡云顶,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经确定了新加坡云顶的一个警告标志,你应该注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发