share_log

Institutional Investors Are Shopify Inc.'s (NYSE:SHOP) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$6.6b Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are Shopify Inc.'s (NYSE:SHOP) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$6.6b Market Cap Gain

机构投资者是shopify公司(纽交所:SHOP)的最大赌徒,在上周美国市值增加了66亿美元后获得了回报
Simply Wall St ·  09/23 09:39

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Shopify's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 47% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鉴于机构在该股票中持有大量股份,shopify的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响
  • 前25大股东持有47%的业务。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

Every investor in Shopify Inc. (NYSE:SHOP) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 65% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

任何Shopify Inc.(纽交所:SHOP)的投资者都应该注意最强大的股东群体。机构拥有65%的股份,在公司中拥有最多的股份。也就是说,如果股价上涨,这个群体将获得最多的利益(或者如果出现下跌,将承受最大的损失)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$6.6b in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 47% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上周该公司市值增加了66亿美元,为机构投资者带来了好消息。目前的投资回报率为47%,而上周的增长令人欣喜。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shopify.

在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注shopify的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:SHOP Ownership Breakdown September 23rd 2024
纽交所:shopify所有权占比2024年9月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shopify?

机构所有权对shopify有何影响?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

Shopify already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shopify, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

shopify的股东名单上已经有机构。实际上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为有时机构也会做出糟糕的投资,就像所有人一样。如果两位大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,很常见会看到股价大幅下跌。因此值得检查shopify的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他要考虑的因素。

big
NYSE:SHOP Earnings and Revenue Growth September 23rd 2024
纽交所:shopify盈利和营业收入增长2024年9月23日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shopify. Capital Research and Management Company is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.8% of shares outstanding. With 6.2% and 4.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Tobias Lütke and Baillie Gifford & Co. are the second and third largest shareholders. Tobias Lütke, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

投资者应注意,机构实际拥有超过公司一半的股权,因此他们可以集体行使重大的影响力。我们注意到,对shopify来说,对冲基金没有实质性投资。资本研究和管理公司是目前公司最大的股东,持有8.8%的股份。Tobias Lütke和Baillie Gifford & Co.分别持有6.2%和4.3%的股份。Tobias Lütke,作为第二大股东,也是首席执行官。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Shopify

shopify的内部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Shopify Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$6.4b. we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告,内部持有人拥有shopify股票。内部持有人持有价值64亿美元的股份。我们有时会对他们是在买入还是卖出感兴趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大众,包括散户,拥有公司29%的股权,因此不能被轻易忽视。虽然这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面左右一个决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shopify better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Shopify you should know about.

考虑到拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地理解Shopify,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。考虑风险,例如。每家公司都会有风险,我们已经发现了Shopify的2个警示信号,您应该了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发