share_log

Scholar Education Group's (HKG:1769) Soft Earnings Don't Show The Whole Picture

Scholar Education Group's (HKG:1769) Soft Earnings Don't Show The Whole Picture

学者教育集团(HKG:1769)的软收入并不能展现全貌
Simply Wall St ·  09/23 18:53

The market for Scholar Education Group's (HKG:1769) shares didn't move much after it posted weak earnings recently. We think that the softer headline numbers might be getting counterbalanced by some positive underlying factors.

学者教育集团(HKG:1769)的股票在最近公布弱势收益后没有太大波动。我们认为,较软的主要数字可能会被一些积极的潜在因素抵消。

big
SEHK:1769 Earnings and Revenue History September 23rd 2024
SEHK:1769盈利和营业收入历史 2024年9月23日

A Closer Look At Scholar Education Group's Earnings

深入了解学者教育集团的盈利情况

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

在高金融中,用于衡量公司将报告的利润转化为自由现金流(FCF)的关键比率是计提比率(从现金流量中)。要获取计提比率,我们首先需要将一个期间的自由现金流减去利润,然后将该数字除以该期间的平均营运资产。这个比率告诉我们公司的利润超过了其FCF。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,当公司的应计比率为负时,实际上是一件好事,但如果其应计比率为正,则是一件坏事。虽然应计比率为零以上的事情无关紧要,但我们认为当公司的应计比率相对较高时,值得注意。引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年发表的一篇论文:“应计越高的公司未来利润率越低”。

For the year to June 2024, Scholar Education Group had an accrual ratio of -0.39. That indicates that its free cash flow quite significantly exceeded its statutory profit. In fact, it had free cash flow of CN¥181m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of CN¥125.7m. Scholar Education Group's free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see. Having said that, there is more to the story. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

截至2024年6月,学者教育集团的应计比率为-0.39。这表明其自由现金流明显超过了法定利润。事实上,去年它的自由现金流为1.81亿元人民币,远远超过了其法定利润1.257亿元人民币。学者教育集团的自由现金流在过去一年有所提高,这通常是个好迹象。话虽如此,故事还有更多内容。我们可以看到,飞凡项目影响了其法定利润,因此也影响了应计比率。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让您想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看基于其估计的未来盈利能力的互动图表。

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

除了稀释之外,还应该注意的是,万集科技在过去12个月中因不寻常项目获得了价值人民币3.5万元的利润。虽然我们希望看到利润增加,但当这些不寻常项目对利润做出重大贡献时,我们会更加谨慎。我们对全球大部分上市公司的数据进行了分析,发现不寻常项目往往是一次性的。这正如我们所期望的那样,因为这些提升被描述为"不寻常"。相对于其利润而言,万集科技在2021年12月前的不寻常项目贡献大。因此,我们可以推断出,这些不寻常项目正在使其财务利润显著增强。

While the accrual ratio might bode well, we also note that Scholar Education Group's profit was boosted by unusual items worth CN¥20m in the last twelve months. While it's always nice to have higher profit, a large contribution from unusual items sometimes dampens our enthusiasm. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. Which is hardly surprising, given the name. If Scholar Education Group doesn't see that contribution repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to drop over the current year.

尽管应计比率可能是个好兆头,但我们也注意到Scholar Education Group的利润在过去十二个月里因价值2千万元的飞凡项目而得到提升。虽然盈利增加总是令人高兴的,但来自飞凡项目的巨大贡献有时会消减我们的热情。我们对全球大多数上市公司进行了数据分析,发现飞凡项目往往是一次性的。考虑到其名称,这并不奇怪。如果Scholar Education Group未能再次获得这种贡献,其他条件相同的情况下,我们预计其利润在当前年度将会下降。

Our Take On Scholar Education Group's Profit Performance

我们对Scholar Education Group的盈利表现的看法

In conclusion, Scholar Education Group's accrual ratio suggests its statutory earnings are of good quality, but on the other hand the profits were boosted by unusual items. Considering all the aforementioned, we'd venture that Scholar Education Group's profit result is a pretty good guide to its true profitability, albeit a bit on the conservative side. If you'd like to know more about Scholar Education Group as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Scholar Education Group you should be aware of.

总的来说,Scholar Education Group的应计比率表明其会计收益质量良好,但另一方面利润受到飞凡项目的提振。考虑到上述所有情况,我们认为Scholar Education Group的利润结果在相当程度上可以作为其真实盈利能力的良好指引,尽管有点保守。如果您想更多地了解Scholar Education Group作为一家业务的情况,重要的是要意识到其所面临的风险。举个例子:我们发现了Scholar Education Group有1个警示信号,您应该注意。

Our examination of Scholar Education Group has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

我们对Scholar Education Group的检查侧重于一些因素,这些因素可能会让其盈利看起来比实际情况更好。然而,如果您能够把注意力集中在细枝末节上,就会有更多发现。例如,许多人认为高股本回报率是良好业务经济的指标,而其他人则喜欢“跟踪资金”并寻找内部人正在买入的股票。虽然这可能需要您做一些调查研究,但您可能会发现这些关于高股本回报率公司的免费收藏,或者这些拥有重要内部持股的股票列表对您有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发