Hengtong Logistics Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603223) Stock Price Dropped 8.0% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
Hengtong Logistics Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603223) Stock Price Dropped 8.0% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Hengtong Logistics by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 57% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- 23% of Hengtong Logistics is held by insiders
- 私人公司对恒通股份的重要控制意味着普通公众有更多权力来影响管理和治理相关的决策。
- 前2名股东持有57%的业务
- 恒通股份23%的股份由内部持有。
A look at the shareholders of Hengtong Logistics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603223) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 41% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看恒通股份有限公司(SHSE:603223)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权势。拥有41%股份的私人公司在公司中持有最大股份。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体将获益最多(或者在股价下跌时损失最多)。
And following last week's 8.0% decline in share price, private companies suffered the most losses.
在上周股价下跌了8.0%之后,私营公司遭受了最大的损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hengtong Logistics.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于恒通股份的什么情况。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hengtong Logistics?
机构持股缺失对恒通股份意味着什么?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我们不会看到机构投资者持有非常高风险、交易较少或非常小的公司的股票。虽然有时会看到大公司没有机构在注册表上,但这并不是特别普遍的情况。
There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Hengtong Logistics' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.
公司没有机构在股东名册上可能有很多原因。如果流动性(每天交易的股票数量)较低,机构可能难以购买大量股份。如果公司没有需要筹集资本,机构可能缺少建仓机会。也有可能基金经理没有持有该股,因为他们不相信其表现会好。恒通股份的收益和营业收入情况(下文)可能对机构投资者没有说服力,或者他们可能只是没有仔细观察过该业务。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hengtong Logistics. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Nanshan Group Co.,Ltd with 41% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 16% and 4.5% of the stock.
对于恒通股份,对冲基金持有的股份不多。根据我们的数据,最大的股东是南山集团有限公司,持有41%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有大约16%和4.5%的股票。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.
股权登记簿的更详细研究向我们表明,前两大股东通过其拥有的57%股份在该公司拥有重大持股。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
普通公众持有北方铜业的23%股份。虽然这个群体不能决定公司的命运,但它肯定会对公司运营方式产生真正的影响。
Insider Ownership Of Hengtong Logistics
恒通股份的内部股权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Hengtong Logistics Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.7b, and insiders have CN¥1.3b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息显示,内部人士在恒通股份有限公司持有大量股份。其市值仅为57亿人民币,内部人士名下持有价值13亿人民币的股份。看到内部人士如此投资业务是很不错的。也许值得查看这些内部人士最近是否一直在购买。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 35% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,包括散户投资者,持有该公司的35%股份,因此不容忽视。尽管该集体不能从根本上决定公司的命运,但它肯定会对公司的运行产生实质性的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 41%, of the Hengtong Logistics stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
恒通股份股权有41%掌握在私营公司手中。 进一步深入了解可能是值得的。如果内部人员等相关方对其中一家私营公司有利益,那应在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能对该公司有战略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hengtong Logistics better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Hengtong Logistics (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable) that you should be aware of.
考虑到不同股东群体总是值得的。但要更好地了解恒通股份,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经确定了2个警示信号对恒通股份(其中1个让我们感到有点不舒服)需要您注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
当然,这也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我们免费的潜力股票收藏,这些股票具有有利的财务状况。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。