share_log

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Remitly Global, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RELY) Recent US$90m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Remitly Global, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RELY) Recent US$90m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

机构所有者可能会考虑采取极端措施,因为远赴全球货币, Inc.(纳斯达克: RELY)最近的9千万美元下跌加剧了长期亏损
Simply Wall St ·  09/24 07:11

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Remitly Global's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 机构拥有量极高意味着Remitly Global的股价对其交易行为非常敏感
  • 业务的52%由8个最大的股东持有。
  • 内部人员最近一直在卖出。

A look at the shareholders of Remitly Global, Inc. (NASDAQ:RELY) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 63% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下Remitly Global,Inc. (纳斯达克: RELY) 的股东可以告诉我们哪个团体最具影响力。 机构拥有63%的股份,是公司中持有最多股份的团体。 换句话说,该团体对其投资到公司中最有可能获益(或损失) 。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$90m. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 43% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Remitly Global which might hurt individual investors.

作为结果,在市值下跌了9千万美元之后,机构投资者上周承受了最高的亏损。这一类投资者可能特别关注当前的亏损,这为股东增加了一年43%的亏损。通常被称为“市场推动者”的机构在影响任何股票价格动态方面拥有重要的影响力。因此,如果下跌持续下去,机构投资者可能面临压力,必须卖出Remitly Global,这可能会伤害个人投资者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Remitly Global.

在下面的图表中,我们将重点关注Remitly Global的不同所有权群体。

big
NasdaqGS:RELY Ownership Breakdown September 24th 2024
纳斯达克:RELY所有权拆分2024年9月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Remitly Global?

机构持有权告诉我们Remitly Global的什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

Remitly Global already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Remitly Global's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Remitly Global已经有机构出现在股东名册上。确实,他们在公司拥有一定的股权。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会犯投资错误,就像每个人都会一样。当多个机构拥有一支股票时,总是存在他们处于“拥挤交易”中的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Remitly Global的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事并不只是这些。

big
NasdaqGS:RELY Earnings and Revenue Growth September 24th 2024
纳斯达克GS:RELY2024年9月24日收益和营业收入增长

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Remitly Global. Naspers Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.2% and 5.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Matthew Oppenheimer directly holds 2.3% of the total shares outstanding.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们集体可以行使重要权力。我们注意到对Remitly Global,对冲基金并没有具有实质性投资。 Naspers有限公司目前是该公司最大的股东,持有19%的股份。而第二和第三大股东分别持有公司已发行股份的7.2%和5.5%。另外,该公司CEO Matthew Oppenheimer直接持有已发行股份的2.3%。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

内部人员拥有佛山蓝火箭电子股份有限公司的重要比例。内部人员在这家69亿元人民币的企业中持有25亿元人民币的股份,看到内部人员如此投资是很好的。如果这些内部人员最近一直在购买,那就值得检查。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构持股比例是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。同样可以通过研究分析师情绪来实现。由于相当多的分析师都关注着该股票,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Remitly Global

Remitly Global的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Remitly Global, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$174m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最近的数据显示,内部股东拥有Remitly Global, Inc.的部分股份。 内部人士持有价值1.74亿美元的有意义的股份。 大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。 大多数人会认为这显示了股东和董事会利益一致。 不过,值得注意的是,可能值得查看这些内部人士是否一直在卖出股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公众,包括散户投资者,在该公司中拥有12%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略他们。虽然这种所有权规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

It appears to us that public companies own 19% of Remitly Global. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

我们发现Remitly Global有19%的股份属于上市公司。我们不能确定,但很可能这是一种战略性持有。这些企业可能是类似的,或者彼此合作。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Remitly Global better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Remitly Global has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

总是值得考虑公司股东的各个群体。但是,为了更好地了解Remitly Global,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,承担风险 - Remitly Global存在1个警示标志,我们认为您应该注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发