With 70% Ownership, Simmons First National Corporation (NASDAQ:SFNC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 70% Ownership, Simmons First National Corporation (NASDAQ:SFNC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Simmons First National implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 机构对Simmons First National的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价有重要影响
- 前12名股东拥有该公司50%的股份。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Simmons First National Corporation (NASDAQ:SFNC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 70% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
想要了解谁真正控制着Simmons First National Corporation(纳斯达克:SFNC),重要的是要了解公司的所有权结构。 机构持有70%的股份,在该公司拥有最大股份。 换句话说,该团体将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或失去最多)
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因为机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往带有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者来说。因此,机构投资在一家公司中的大量资金通常被视为一个积极因素。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Simmons First National.
在下面的图表中,我们将放大 Simmons First National 的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Simmons First National?
机构持股告诉我们关于辛蒙斯第一国民的情况
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Simmons First National already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Simmons First National's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Simmons First National 已经拥有机构在股份登记册上。实际上,他们在公司拥有一定比例的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区享有一定程度的信誉。然而,最好要警惕依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会犯错。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下降。因此,值得查看 Simmons First National 的下面的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Simmons First National. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 14% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 5.8% of the company stock.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。对于Simmons First National,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是BlackRock, Inc.拥有14%的流通股份。第二大股东为The Vanguard Group, Inc.拥有公司11%的普通股,而Dimensional Fund Advisors LP持有约5.8%的公司股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
我们对所有权的深入研究表明,前12名股东合计拥有50%的持股,意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Simmons First National
辛蒙斯第一国民的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We can see that insiders own shares in Simmons First National Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$46m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以看到,内部持有人持有simmons first national公司的股份。 内部持有人持有价值4600万美元的重要股份。 大多数人会将此视为真正的积极因素。 如果您想探讨内部人员对齐的问题,可以单击此处查看内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Simmons First National. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
拥有28%股权的普通大众,主要由个人投资者组成,对simmons first national产生了一定程度的影响。 虽然这一群体不一定能左右决策,但肯定能对公司的经营产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Simmons First National better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Simmons First National .
考虑公司股份持有者的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地理解辛蒙斯第一国家,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该注意我们发现的辛蒙斯第一国家的1个警示信号。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。