share_log

Institutional Investors in Lemonade, Inc. (NYSE:LMND) Lost 4.5% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in Lemonade, Inc. (NYSE:LMND) Lost 4.5% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

纽交所上的柠檬公司(NYSE:LMND)的机构投资者上周损失了4.5%,但在长期增长中获益。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/09/24 08:07

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Lemonade's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,Lemonade的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 50% 的业务由前9名股东持有
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Lemonade, Inc. (NYSE:LMND), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 47% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制了Lemonade, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:LMND),了解业务的所有权结构很重要。机构拥有47%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 4.5% in value last week. However, the 49% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

没有股东喜欢在投资中蒙受损失,尤其是上周持股价值下降4.5%的机构投资者。但是,49%的一年期回报率可能有助于减轻他们的总体损失。但是,我们假设他们将来会注意弱点。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lemonade, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Lemonade的每种类型的所有者。

big
NYSE:LMND Ownership Breakdown September 24th 2024
纽约证券交易所:LMND 所有权明细 2024 年 9 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lemonade?

关于柠檬水,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lemonade. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lemonade, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者在Lemonade中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Lemonade过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:LMND Earnings and Revenue Growth September 24th 2024
纽约证券交易所:LMND 收益和收入增长 2024 年 9 月 24 日

Lemonade is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Softbank Group Capital Limited is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.5% and 5.7% of the stock.

柠檬水不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,软银集团资本有限公司是最大股东,已发行股份的17%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约7.5%和5.7%的股份。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前9名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Lemonade

柠檬水的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Lemonade, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$74m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士拥有Lemonade, Inc.的部分股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意义的调整通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约7400万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lemonade. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Lemonade拥有28%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对Lemonade有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

Private equity firms hold a 17% stake in Lemonade. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股权公司持有Lemonade17%的股份。这表明他们可以在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。一些投资者可能会为此感到鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励制定有助于市场看到公司价值的策略。或者,这些持有人可能会在投资上市后退出投资。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Lemonade that you should be aware of before investing here.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了Lemonade的1个警告信号,在这里投资之前你应该注意这个信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发