Pinlive Foods Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300892) CEO Mu Wang Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 34% Last Week
Pinlive Foods Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300892) CEO Mu Wang Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 34% Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant insider control over Pinlive Foods implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 2 shareholders own 62% of the company
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 品渥食品存在重要的内部控制,意味着对公司增长有着根深蒂固的利益
- 前两大股东持有该公司62%的股份。
- 公司过去的业绩以及所有权数据,有助于形成对业务前景的强烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Pinlive Foods Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300892) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 67% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看品渥食品股份有限公司(SZSE:300892)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最具影响力。个人内部人士占有公司的最大股份,占比为67%。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥1.8b market cap following a 34% gain in the stock.
作为结果,在上周公司股价上涨34%,达到18亿人民币市值,内部人士得分最高。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Pinlive Foods.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于品渥食品的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pinlive Foods?
机构的持股情况告诉我们关于品渥食品的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Since institutions own only a small portion of Pinlive Foods, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
由于机构只拥有品渥食品的一小部分股份,许多人可能没有花太多时间考虑这支股票。但显然有些人已经这么做了;他们喜欢它到足以买入。因此,如果公司本身可以随着时间的推移改善,我们很可能会在未来看到更多的机构购买者。如果多个机构投资者正试图同时买入一只股票,那么看到股价大涨并不罕见。所以,看一下下面的历史收益轨迹,但记住最重要的是未来。
Pinlive Foods is not owned by hedge funds. With a 45% stake, CEO Mu Wang is the largest shareholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 16% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.3% by the third-largest shareholder.
品渥食品不是机构所拥有。拥有45%股份,CEO王幕是最大的股东。为了更好理解,第二大股东持有约16%的股份,第三大股东持有5.3%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
尽管我们需要研究一个公司的机构所有权数据是有道理的,但也需要研究分析师的情绪来了解市场趋势。我们目前没有发现任何关于该股票的分析师报道,所以该公司可能不受广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Pinlive Foods
品渥食品内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Pinlive Foods Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥1.8b, that means they have CN¥1.2b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我们最新的数据显示,品渥食品有限公司的大部分股权属于内部人士。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决策。考虑到它的市值为人民币18亿,这意味着他们持有价值12亿人民币的股份。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可以免费了解他们是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公众,包括零售投资者,拥有该公司的23%股份,因此不容易被忽视。尽管占有的股份较大,但如果决策不与其他大股东保持一致,这家公司的政策可能无法改变。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 5.3%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据显示,私人公司持有公司5.3%的股份。单凭这个事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得进一步调查谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人员或其他相关方可能通过单独的私人公司持有公共公司股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Pinlive Foods that you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体很重要,但还有更重要的因素。例如,我们已经为品渥食品确定了2个警告信号,您应该注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
当然,这也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我们免费的潜力股票收藏,这些股票具有有利的财务状况。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。