Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Techtronic Industries Company Limited (HKG:669) With 45% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Techtronic Industries Company Limited (HKG:669) With 45% Ownership
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Techtronic Industries' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders own 25% of Techtronic Industries
- 机构持股比例高意味着德信电气股价对其交易行为敏感
- 共有13位投资者持有该公司51%的所有权。
- 内部人员拥有德信电气25%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Techtronic Industries Company Limited (HKG:669) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 45% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
从德信电气公司有限公司(HKG:669)的股东看,我们可以知道哪个群体最具影响力。持有最大份额的是拥有45%股份的机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上升潜力(或下跌风险)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit HK$206b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 51%.
上周,机构投资者在公司市值达到2060亿港元后获益最大。上周的收益将进一步提高股东的一年回报率,目前为51%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Techtronic Industries.
下图显示,我们将重点关注Techtronic Industries的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Techtronic Industries?
机构所有权告诉我们什么关于Techtronic Industries?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Techtronic Industries. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Techtronic Industries' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如您所见,机构投资者在Techtronic Industries拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好不要过于依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会犯错。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下方的Techtronic Industries盈利历史。当然,真正重要的是未来。
Techtronic Industries is not owned by hedge funds. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Techtronic Industries' case, its Top Key Executive, Horst Julius Pudwill, is the largest shareholder, holding 20% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.8% by the third-largest shareholder.
理想建业不是对冲基金所有。因为行动胜于言辞,当内部持有人拥有公司的重要股份时,我们认为这是一个好迹象。在理想建业的情况下,其最高主要执行官Horst Julius Pudwill是最大的股东,持有流通股的20%。 作为背景,第二大股东持有约9.0%的流通股,第三大股东持有2.8%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记册上看,13大股东控制了51%的股权,这意味着没有单一股东拥有这一股权的大多数利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Techtronic Industries
理想建业内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Techtronic Industries Company Limited. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful HK$52b stake in this HK$206b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我们的信息显示,内部人士在理工电子有限公司拥有大量持股。看到内部人士在这家市值2060亿港元的企业中拥有价值520亿港元的股份,这实在是非常有趣。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一同投资。您可能希望查看这份免费图表,其中显示了内部人士最近的交易。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 29% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Techtronic Industries. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有29%股权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对理工电子产生了一定的影响力。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以影响政策决定的利好,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Techtronic Industries better, we need to consider many other factors.
考虑到持有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地了解理工电子,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以在以下详细图表中找到历史收益和收入。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。