IReader Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603533) Adds CN¥685m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 51% Stake in That Gain
IReader Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603533) Adds CN¥685m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 51% Stake in That Gain
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant insider control over IReader Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- 51% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- IReader Technology重要的内部人控制意味着对公司增长利益的关注
- 前三大股东持有该业务的51%。
- 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。
A look at the shareholders of IReader Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603533) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 51% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下掌阅科技股份有限公司(SHSE:603533)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。持有最大股份的是个别内部股东,占51%股权。换句话说,该群体将从他们投资公司中获益最多(或亏损最严重)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥685m last week.
显然,在上周公司市值上涨了68500万人民币之后,内部人受益最多。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of IReader Technology.
在下图中,我们放大了掌阅科技的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About IReader Technology?
机构交易数据对掌阅科技有何影响?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Institutions have a very small stake in IReader Technology. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
机构在掌阅科技中占有的股份很少。这表明该公司受到一些基金的关注,但目前并不是专业投资者特别青睐的对象。因此,如果公司本身能够随着时间的推移改善,我们很可能会在未来看到更多机构买家。当多个机构投资者想要购买股票时,我们经常会看到股价上涨。过去的营业收入轨迹(如下所示)可能是未来增长的一个指标,但并不能保证。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in IReader Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Ling Yun Zhang, with ownership of 23%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 21% and 7.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Xiang Jun Cheng, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
对于掌阅科技,对冲基金并没有持有太多股份。该公司最大的股东是 Ling Yun Zhang,持有23%的股份。同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有流通中股份的21%和7.0%。同时担任首席执行官的第二大股东是 Xiang Jun Cheng。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 51% stake.
股东登记簿的更详细研究表明,前三大股东拥有51%的股权,其所有权相当重要。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化学技术股份有限公司的内部人员拥有重要比例,内部人员在这家总价值27亿人民币的公司中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否进行了买卖。
Insider Ownership Of IReader Technology
掌阅科技的内部人控制权。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of IReader Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥3.8b stake in this CN¥7.6b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if they have been selling down their stake.
我们的信息显示,内部人士拥有掌阅科技有限公司超过一半的股份。 这使他们有效地控制着公司。 这意味着内部人士在这家76亿人民币的公司中拥有非常有意义的38亿人民币的股份。 大多数人会认为这是正面的,显示了与股东的强大一致性。 您可以单击此处查看他们是否一直在减少持股。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in IReader Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公众,通常是个别投资者,在掌阅科技持有37%的股份。 尽管这个群体不能必然决定事务,但肯定可以对公司的经营方式产生真正的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 7.4%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的7.4%。私人公司可能是相关方。有时内部人员通过持有私人公司的股份而不是以个人身份持有某家公共公司的股份,对某家公共公司表现出兴趣。虽然很难得出任何笼统的结论,但值得注意作为进一步研究的一个领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。