share_log

Read This Before Judging The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CHEF) ROE

Read This Before Judging The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CHEF) ROE

在评判The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.(纳斯达克:CHEF)的roe之前,请阅读此文。
Simply Wall St ·  09/27 06:25

Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (NASDAQ:CHEF).

许多投资者仍在学习分析股票时可以派上用场的各种指标。本文是为那些想要了解净资产收益率 (roe) 的人准备的。为了使课程更加贴近实际情况,我们将使用roe来更好地了解The Chefs' Warehouse,Inc.(纳斯达克:CHEF)。

Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.

股东权益回报率(ROE)是检验公司增加其价值和管理投资者资金有效性的测试。简而言之,ROE显示每个美元的利润与其股东的投资有关。

How Is ROE Calculated?

净资产收益率怎么计算?

The formula for ROE is:

roe的公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

净资产收益率 = 净利润(从持续经营中获得)÷ 股东权益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Chefs' Warehouse is:

因此,根据上述公式,Chefs' Warehouse的ROE为:

8.8% = US$41m ÷ US$462m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

8.8% = 4100万美元 ÷ 46200万美元(基于截至2024年6月的过去十二个月)。

The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.09 in profit.

“收益”是过去十二个月税后收益。一个理解的方式是,在每美元股东的资本中,公司赚了$0.09的利润。

Does Chefs' Warehouse Have A Good ROE?

厨师们的食品供应商的roe是好的吗?

One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Chefs' Warehouse has a lower ROE than the average (12%) in the Consumer Retailing industry classification.

判断一家公司的股东权益回报是否良好的一个简单方法是将其与同行业的平均水平进行比较。这种方法的局限性在于,有些公司即使属于同一行业分类,也可能存在较大差异。如果你查看下面的图片,你会发现Chefs' Warehouse的roe低于消费零售行业分类的平均水平(12%)。

big
NasdaqGS:CHEF Return on Equity September 27th 2024
纳斯达克CHEF股票2024年9月27日的股东权益回报率

Unfortunately, that's sub-optimal. However, a low ROE is not always bad. If the company's debt levels are moderate to low, then there's still a chance that returns can be improved via the use of financial leverage. A high debt company having a low ROE is a different story altogether and a risky investment in our books.

不幸的是,这是次优的。然而,低ROE并不总是不好。如果公司的债务水平适中或较低,则仍有可能通过使用财务杠杆来改善回报。对于具有高债务且ROE低的公司,则完全是另外一回事,是我们书中的高风险投资。

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

为什么在观察ROE时你应该考虑债务问题?

Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.

几乎所有公司都需要资金来投资业务以增加利润。投资所需的现金可以来自前年的利润(留存收益)、发行新股或借款。在前两种情况下,ROE将反映出这种用于投资业务的现金使用。在后一种情况下,用于增长的债务将提高回报,但不会影响总资产净额。这将使ROE看起来比不使用债务要好。

Combining Chefs' Warehouse's Debt And Its 8.8% Return On Equity

Combining Chefs' Warehouse的债务及其8.8%的资产回报率

Chefs' Warehouse clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 1.47. Its ROE is quite low, even with the use of significant debt; that's not a good result, in our opinion. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.

Chefs' Warehouse显然利用大量债务来提高回报率,因为其债务-股本比率为1.47。即使债务高企,其ROE仍然相当低,这在我们看来并不是一个好的结果。投资者应该仔细考虑,如果一家公司无法轻松借款,那么它可能会表现如何,因为信贷市场随时间会发生变化。

Conclusion

结论

Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.

ROE是我们可以比较不同公司业务质量的一种方式。能够在不太依赖债务的情况下实现高ROE的公司通常是高品质的。如果两家公司的ROE相同,则通常会更喜欢债务较少的那家公司。

Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

话虽如此,虽然roe是业务质量的有用指标,但您必须考虑一整套因素来确定购买股票的正确价格。考虑到其他因素,例如未来的利润增长情况和今后需要投入多少投资等等,这些也是很重要的。因此,我认为值得查看有关公司分析师预测的免费报告。

But note: Chefs' Warehouse may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt.

但请注意:Chefs' Warehouse可能不是最佳的股票买入选择。因此,请查看这份免费的有高ROE和低债务的有趣公司名单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发