share_log

With 86% Institutional Ownership, Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 86% Institutional Ownership, Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

拥有86%的机构所有权,Evergy, Inc. (纳斯达克:EVRG)在大型机构中备受青睐
Simply Wall St ·  09/27 09:07

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Evergy's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 19 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构持有量高意味着西星能源的股价对他们的交易行为很敏感
  • 前19名股东拥有该公司51%的股份。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看一下西星能源股份有限公司(纳斯达克:EVRG)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最有影响力。我们可以看到,公司中机构拥有绝大多数股份,占有86%。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体将获益最多(或者如果行情出现下滑,将损失最多)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由于机构股东拥有巨大的资源池和流动资金,他们的投资决策往往承载着很大的权重,特别是对个人投资者来说。因此,机构投入该公司的资金通常是对其未来的极大信心。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Evergy.

让我们仔细看看股东的不同类型可以告诉我们关于西星能源的什么。

big
NasdaqGS:EVRG Ownership Breakdown September 27th 2024
NasdaqGS:EVRG拥有权益分布2024年9月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Evergy?

机构持股告诉我们什么关于Evergy?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Evergy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Evergy's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到西星能源确实拥有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司股份的相当大一部分。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过这支股票并且喜欢它。但就像任何人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果多家机构同时改变对某支股票的观点,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此值得看看西星能源以下的营业收入历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:EVRG Earnings and Revenue Growth September 27th 2024
纳斯达克股票交易所:EVRG盈利和营业收入增长2024年9月27日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Evergy. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are State Street Global Advisors, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.2%.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。我们注意到对西星能源的头寸不像对冲基金那样有意义。我们的数据显示,凡普集团是最大的股东,持有13%的股份。第二大和第三大股东分别是道富银行全球机构和贝莱德公司,他们各自持有7.2%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 19 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

观察股东登记表,我们可以看到51%的所有权由前19位股东控制,这意味着没有单一的股东掌握了多数股权所有权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of Evergy

Evergy的内部股权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Evergy, Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$45m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的数据显示,内部人士只拥有西星能源股份的不到1%。由于这是一家大公司,我们只期望内部人士拥有很小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他们持有价值4500万美元的股票。在这种情况下,更有趣的是看看这些内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Evergy. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在西星能源中持有13%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响其政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Evergy (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .

我觉得看看公司的实际持有人非常有趣。但要真正获得深入见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该了解西星能源存在的3个警示信号(其中1个有点令人担忧)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发