The projected fair value for United Parks & Resorts is US$51.63 based on 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity
Current share price of US$51.34 suggests United Parks & Resorts is potentially trading close to its fair value
Our fair value estimate is 17% lower than United Parks & Resorts' analyst price target of US$62.36
Does the September share price for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (NYSE:PRKS) reflect what it's really worth? Today, we will estimate the stock's intrinsic value by projecting its future cash flows and then discounting them to today's value. One way to achieve this is by employing the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. There's really not all that much to it, even though it might appear quite complex.
We would caution that there are many ways of valuing a company and, like the DCF, each technique has advantages and disadvantages in certain scenarios. If you still have some burning questions about this type of valuation, take a look at the Simply Wall St analysis model.
The Calculation
We are going to use a two-stage DCF model, which, as the name states, takes into account two stages of growth. The first stage is generally a higher growth period which levels off heading towards the terminal value, captured in the second 'steady growth' period. To begin with, we have to get estimates of the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.
Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we need to discount the sum of these future cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate:
10-year free cash flow (FCF) forecast
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
Levered FCF ($, Millions)
US$294.5m
US$308.5m
US$262.0m
US$236.4m
US$222.1m
US$214.3m
US$210.6m
US$209.7m
US$210.6m
US$212.9m
Growth Rate Estimate Source
Analyst x2
Analyst x2
Analyst x1
Est @ -9.75%
Est @ -6.08%
Est @ -3.50%
Est @ -1.70%
Est @ -0.44%
Est @ 0.44%
Est @ 1.06%
Present Value ($, Millions) Discounted @ 9.0%
US$270
US$260
US$202
US$167
US$144
US$128
US$115
US$105
US$96.9
US$89.8
("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St) Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = US$1.6b
After calculating the present value of future cash flows in the initial 10-year period, we need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all future cash flows beyond the first stage. The Gordon Growth formula is used to calculate Terminal Value at a future annual growth rate equal to the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield of 2.5%. We discount the terminal cash flows to today's value at a cost of equity of 9.0%.
Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= US$3.4b÷ ( 1 + 9.0%)10= US$1.4b
The total value, or equity value, is then the sum of the present value of the future cash flows, which in this case is US$3.0b. The last step is to then divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of US$51.3, the company appears about fair value at a 0.6% discount to where the stock price trades currently. The assumptions in any calculation have a big impact on the valuation, so it is better to view this as a rough estimate, not precise down to the last cent.
The Assumptions
We would point out that the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate and of course the actual cash flows. You don't have to agree with these inputs, I recommend redoing the calculations yourself and playing with them. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at United Parks & Resorts as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 9.0%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.580. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.
SWOT Analysis for United Parks & Resorts
Strength
Debt is well covered by earnings and cashflows.
Balance sheet summary for PRKS.
Weakness
Earnings declined over the past year.
Opportunity
Annual earnings are forecast to grow for the next 3 years.
Good value based on P/E ratio and estimated fair value.
Threat
Total liabilities exceed total assets, which raises the risk of financial distress.
Annual earnings are forecast to grow slower than the American market.
Is PRKS well equipped to handle threats?
Moving On:
Although the valuation of a company is important, it is only one of many factors that you need to assess for a company. The DCF model is not a perfect stock valuation tool. Rather it should be seen as a guide to "what assumptions need to be true for this stock to be under/overvalued?" If a company grows at a different rate, or if its cost of equity or risk free rate changes sharply, the output can look very different. For United Parks & Resorts, there are three important aspects you should explore:
Risks: Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for United Parks & Resorts you should know about.
Management:Have insiders been ramping up their shares to take advantage of the market's sentiment for PRKS's future outlook? Check out our management and board analysis with insights on CEO compensation and governance factors.
Other High Quality Alternatives: Do you like a good all-rounder? Explore our interactive list of high quality stocks to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!
PS. The Simply Wall St app conducts a discounted cash flow valuation for every stock on the NYSE every day. If you want to find the calculation for other stocks just search here.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content?Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
我们需要指出,贴现现金流最重要的输入是贴现率和当然是实际现金流。您并非一定要同意这些输入,我建议您重新进行计算并调整这些数值。贴现现金流也未考虑行业可能的周期性,或公司未来的资本需求,因此无法完全展示公司可能的表现。考虑到我们正在看待美国波维尔乐园(United Parks & Resorts)作为潜在股东,所以使用的权益成本用作贴现率,而不是资本成本(或资本加权平均成本,WACC),后者考虑了债务。在这个计算中,我们使用了9.0%,基于1.580的杠杆贝塔。贝塔是股票波动性的度量,与整个市场相比。我们从全球可比公司的行业平均贝塔中获取我们的贝塔,设定在0.8和2.0之间,这是一个稳定业务的合理范围。
联合公园和度假胜地的SWOT分析
优势
债务得到充分覆盖,收入和现金流决定了债务水平。
PRKS的资产负债表摘要。
弱点
过去一年的收益下降了。
机会
预计未来3年的年度收益将增长。
基于市盈率和预估公平价值,出现良好的价值。
威胁
总负债超过总资产,增加了财务困境的风险
预计年度收益增长速度将慢于美国市场。
PRKS是否有足够的能力应对威胁?
接下来:
虽然公司的估值很重要,但只是您评估公司时需要考虑的许多因素之一。贴现现金流量模型并不是一个完美的股票估值工具,而应该被视为一个指导,告诉您"为了让这支股票被低估/高估,哪些假设需要成立?"如果一个公司以不同的速度增长,或者其权益成本或无风险利率发生剧烈变化,那么结果可能会大不相同。对于United Parks & Resorts,有三个重要的方面您应该探索:
风险:每家公司都有风险,我们已经发现了United Parks & Resorts 2个警告信号,您应该了解。