share_log

We Don't Think SIM Technology Group's (HKG:2000) Earnings Should Make Shareholders Too Comfortable

We Don't Think SIM Technology Group's (HKG:2000) Earnings Should Make Shareholders Too Comfortable

我们认为SIM Technology Group (HKG:2000)的收益不应该使股东过于舒适
Simply Wall St ·  09/27 19:10

Solid profit numbers didn't seem to be enough to please SIM Technology Group Limited's (HKG:2000) shareholders. Our analysis has found some concerning factors which weaken the profit's foundation.

稳健的利润数字似乎不足以取悦SiM Technology Group Limited(HKG: 2000)的股东。我们的分析发现了一些削弱利润基础的相关因素。

big
SEHK:2000 Earnings and Revenue History September 27th 2024
SEHK: 2000 收益和收入历史记录 2024 年 9 月 27 日

A Closer Look At SIM Technology Group's Earnings

仔细研究SiM科技集团的收益

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

正如金融迷已经知道的那样,现金流的应计比率是评估公司自由现金流(FCF)与利润匹配程度的关键指标。为了获得应计比率,我们首先从一段时期的利润中减去FCF,然后将该数字除以该期间的平均运营资产。该比率向我们显示了公司的利润超过其FCF的程度。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

因此,当公司的应计比率为负时,这实际上被认为是一件好事,但如果其应计比率为正,则是一件坏事。虽然正应计比率表明非现金利润达到一定水平不是问题,但高应计比率可以说是一件坏事,因为它表明纸面利润与现金流不匹配。值得注意的是,有一些学术证据表明,总的来说,高应计率对短期利润来说是个坏兆头。

Over the twelve months to June 2024, SIM Technology Group recorded an accrual ratio of 0.46. As a general rule, that bodes poorly for future profitability. To wit, the company did not generate one whit of free cashflow in that time. In the last twelve months it actually had negative free cash flow, with an outflow of HK$67m despite its profit of HK$312.4m, mentioned above. Coming off the back of negative free cash flow last year, we imagine some shareholders might wonder if its cash burn of HK$67m, this year, indicates high risk. Having said that, there is more to the story. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part. The good news for shareholders is that SIM Technology Group's accrual ratio was much better last year, so this year's poor reading might simply be a case of a short term mismatch between profit and FCF. As a result, some shareholders may be looking for stronger cash conversion in the current year.

在截至2024年6月的十二个月中,SiM科技集团的应计比率为0.46。通常,这对未来的盈利能力来说是个坏兆头。换句话说,该公司在那段时间内没有产生一点自由现金流。在过去的十二个月中,它的自由现金流实际上为负数,尽管如上所述,其利润为3.124亿港元,但流出量仍为6700万港元。在去年自由现金流为负的背景下,我们认为一些股东可能会怀疑其今年6700万港元的现金消耗是否表明存在高风险。话虽如此,故事还有更多。应计比率至少部分反映了不寻常项目对法定利润的影响。对股东来说,好消息是,SiM Technology Group去年的应计比率要好得多,因此今年的糟糕数据可能只是利润与FCF之间短期不匹配的情况。因此,一些股东可能希望在本年度实现更强的现金转换。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of SIM Technology Group.

注意:我们始终建议投资者检查资产负债表的实力。点击此处查看我们对SiM科技集团的资产负债表分析。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

不寻常的物品如何影响利润?

Given the accrual ratio, it's not overly surprising that SIM Technology Group's profit was boosted by unusual items worth HK$493m in the last twelve months. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And that's as you'd expect, given these boosts are described as 'unusual'. SIM Technology Group had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to June 2024. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items are making its statutory profit significantly stronger than it would otherwise be.

考虑到应计比率,在过去十二个月中,价值4.93亿港元的不寻常项目提振了SiM Technology Group的利润也就不足为奇了。虽然我们希望看到利润增加,但当不寻常的物品做出重大贡献时,我们往往会更加谨慎一些。当我们分析全球绝大多数上市公司时,我们发现重大不寻常的事项往往不会重演。这正如你所预料的那样,因为这些增强被描述为 “不寻常”。相对于其截至2024年6月的利润,SiM科技集团的不寻常项目做出了相当大的贡献。因此,我们可以推测,这些不寻常的物品使其法定利润明显高于原来的水平。

Our Take On SIM Technology Group's Profit Performance

我们对SiM科技集团利润表现的看法

Summing up, SIM Technology Group received a nice boost to profit from unusual items, but could not match its paper profit with free cash flow. For all the reasons mentioned above, we think that, at a glance, SIM Technology Group's statutory profits could be considered to be low quality, because they are likely to give investors an overly positive impression of the company. So while earnings quality is important, it's equally important to consider the risks facing SIM Technology Group at this point in time. For example, SIM Technology Group has 2 warning signs (and 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) we think you should know about.

总而言之,SiM Technology Group从不寻常的项目中获得了不错的利润提振,但其纸面利润无法与自由现金流相提并论。出于上述所有原因,我们认为,乍一看,SiM Technology Group的法定利润可以被认为是低质量的,因为它们可能会给投资者带来对公司的过于积极的印象。因此,尽管收益质量很重要,但考虑SiM Technology Group目前面临的风险同样重要。例如,SiM Technology Group 有 2 个警告标志(以及 1 个让我们有点不舒服)我们认为你应该知道。

In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, and we've come away cautious. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

在这篇文章中,我们研究了许多可能损害利润数字效用的因素,我们采取了谨慎的态度。但是,如果你能够将注意力集中在细节上,总会有更多的事情需要发现。有些人认为高股本回报率是优质业务的好兆头。因此,你可能希望看到这份拥有高股本回报率的公司的免费集合,或者这份内部所有权高的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发