With 43% Ownership in SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 43% Ownership in SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in SFL implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 机构在SFL的大量持股意味着他们对公司的股价有重大影响
- 共有13位投资者持有该公司51%的所有权。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。
Every investor in SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
SFL Corporation Ltd.(纽交所:SFL)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司43%的股权,换句话说,该集团面临着最大的潜在上涨空间(或下行风险)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.6b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 13%.
上周,公司市值达到了16亿美元,机构投资者成为受益最多的一群。上周的收益将进一步提升股东的一年回报率,目前为13%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SFL.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对SFL能提供什么信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SFL?
机构所有权告诉我们SFL有什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in SFL. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see SFL's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在SFL中持有相当的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经研究过这支股票并且他们喜欢。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能会出错。当多家机构持有一支股票时,总会有一种风险,即它们正在进行一种'拥挤交易'。当这种交易失败时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以看到SFL的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事中总是更多的内容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in SFL. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Greenwich Holdings Ltd. with 19% of shares outstanding. With 8.8% and 6.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, DNB Asset Management AS and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.
对冲基金在SFL中没有太多股票。查看我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是Greenwich Holdings Ltd.持有19%的股份。分别持有8.8%和6.7%的股份,DNb Asset Management AS和Dimensional Fund Advisors LP是第二和第三大股东。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据的进一步研究表明,前13大股东拥有51%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of SFL
SFL的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of SFL Corporation Ltd. in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$1.6m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的数据显示,SFL Corporation Ltd.的内部持有者以自己的名义名下不到1%的股份。但他们可能通过我们尚未发现的公司结构间接持有利益。 这是一家大公司,因此即使是小比例的利益也可以在董事会和股东之间产生协调。 在这种情况下,内部持有者拥有价值160万美元的股票。看到至少一些内部持有总是件好事,但值得检查这些内部人员是否一直在卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 38% stake in SFL. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,通常是个体投资者,在SFL持有38%的股份。 虽然这个群体不能必然控制局面,但肯定能对公司的运作产生实质影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 19%, of the SFL stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
看起来,私人公司拥有SFL股票的19%。这可能值得深入研究。如果相关方,如内部人员,在其中一家私人公司中有利益,那应该在年度报告中披露。私人公司可能对公司有战略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for SFL that you should be aware of before investing here.
我发现查看一家公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了SFL的2个警示信号,您在投资之前应该注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。