share_log

With 64% Ownership of the Shares, NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 64% Ownership of the Shares, NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

NewMarket公司(纽交所代号NEU),股份拥有率高达64%,主要由机构投资者持有。
Simply Wall St ·  09/28 10:22

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in NewMarket implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 机构在NewMarket的大量持股表明他们对公司的股价具有重大影响力。
  • 总共有8个投资者拥有该公司的52%所有权。
  • 内部人员最近一直在卖出。

A look at the shareholders of NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 64% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

通过查看NewMarket Corporation (纽交所:NEU) 的股东,我们可以了解哪个群体的力量最强大。持有最大股份的群体是机构,拥有64%的所有权。换句话说,该群体有可能从他们对该公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最多)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于机构业主拥有巨额资源和流动性资产,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,尤其是对个人投资者。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于一家公司通常被视为一种理想的特征。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of NewMarket.

在下面的图表中,我们放大查看newmarket的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:NEU Ownership Breakdown September 28th 2024
纽交所:NEU 2024年9月28日所有权分布

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NewMarket?

机构持股情况对NewMarket意味着什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that NewMarket does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of NewMarket, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到newmarket确实拥有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的相当大部分。 这表明专业投资者之间的一些可信度。 但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会犯错误投资,就像其他人一样。 如果两位大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某只股票,那么很可能会看到股价暴跌。 因此,值得检查newmarket的过去盈利轨迹(如下)。 当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:NEU Earnings and Revenue Growth September 28th 2024
纽交所:NEU盈利和营业收入增长2024年9月28日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. NewMarket is not owned by hedge funds. Bruce Gottwald is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 7.5% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Thomas Gottwald directly holds 3.8% of the total shares outstanding.

由于机构持有超过半数已发行股份,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。newmarket不被对冲基金持有。Bruce Gottwald目前是最大的股东,持有12%的未流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约11%和7.5%的股份。此外,该公司的CEO Thomas Gottwald直接持有总流通股份的3.8%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步调查发现,超过一半的Bentley Systems股份归前8位股东所有,这表明大股东和小股东的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但同时调查分析师建议也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。我们目前没有发现任何关于该公司的分析师报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of NewMarket

NewMarket的内部股权持有情况。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in NewMarket Corporation. Insiders own US$1.2b worth of shares in the US$5.3b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的信息显示,内部持有NewMarket Corporation的股份仍然很大。内部人士在这家价值53亿美元的公司中拥有价值12亿美元的股份。这是相当有意义的。看到这种投资水平是件好事。您可以在这里检查一下,看看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over NewMarket. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有12%股权的普通公众,主要由个体投资者组成,在NewMarket拥有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可观,但如果决定不与其他大股东保持一致,可能还不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with NewMarket .

尽管考虑到拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。为此,您应该注意我们在newmarket发现的2个警告信号。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

当然,您可能会在其他地方找到一项出色的投资。因此,请查看此免费的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发